Solitary man
Well-known member
This is about freedom of speech, and the phenomenon of heavy handed site moderation which imposes great restrictions on our natural inclination to express ourselves openly and freely, and without hindrance.
So far on this site I have had no problems at all as regards freedom of expression, and that's wonderful. But on a few other sites in the past and at present I have noticed that there seems to be a predilection among site owners and site moderators to impose restrictions of what people can say. Sometimes this is in the best interests of all site members, whilst at other times it looks and feels like the owners and moderators are off on a gratuitous power and control trip; attempting the strangulation of all those who dare exercise freedom of thought and expression.
I try to be as diplomatic and innocuous as possible on internet forums, but I also like to challenge people to think and be honest with themselves and others. At times I think this has been misconstrued as troublesome or provocative behaviour, when in fact it has just been an attempt to stimulate discussion, polemic, and debate. The generation of forum activity usually requires a little directness, and a no nonsense, let's get to the heart of this issue approach.
Have you ever felt that you were being penalised for asking perfectly legitimate questions, but in a direct, and dare I say it, confrontational manner; but with good intentions? Have you ever experienced the oppressive measures that can be imposed as a result of exercising freedom of speech, such as petty and unnecessary thread deletions, and gratuitous site bans?
Some site managers make it clear that there is no freedom of speech on their site, actually stating that specifically and verbatim.
Has freedom of speech become the first and most obvious casualty of the internet era? And should we tolerate it?
So far on this site I have had no problems at all as regards freedom of expression, and that's wonderful. But on a few other sites in the past and at present I have noticed that there seems to be a predilection among site owners and site moderators to impose restrictions of what people can say. Sometimes this is in the best interests of all site members, whilst at other times it looks and feels like the owners and moderators are off on a gratuitous power and control trip; attempting the strangulation of all those who dare exercise freedom of thought and expression.
I try to be as diplomatic and innocuous as possible on internet forums, but I also like to challenge people to think and be honest with themselves and others. At times I think this has been misconstrued as troublesome or provocative behaviour, when in fact it has just been an attempt to stimulate discussion, polemic, and debate. The generation of forum activity usually requires a little directness, and a no nonsense, let's get to the heart of this issue approach.
Have you ever felt that you were being penalised for asking perfectly legitimate questions, but in a direct, and dare I say it, confrontational manner; but with good intentions? Have you ever experienced the oppressive measures that can be imposed as a result of exercising freedom of speech, such as petty and unnecessary thread deletions, and gratuitous site bans?
Some site managers make it clear that there is no freedom of speech on their site, actually stating that specifically and verbatim.
Has freedom of speech become the first and most obvious casualty of the internet era? And should we tolerate it?