NeverMore said:
Historically, which country/empire/kingdom etc. had/has the best form of government, in your opinion? Why?[/quote[As much as its citizens whine and complain, America really does have a decent form of government. And all the main problems are externally attributed, not internally part of the political structure.
Well I'd like you to elaborate more on what exactly what you mean by our problems being externally attributed, I think I disagree with you significantly on this topic. While our government is something that works well, I think it doesn't have lasting stability, think about it, our government has been around for only 230 years or so and look at all of the corruption we have already, look at the disconnect we have between our population and our politicians. I believe our government has fundamental problems in the way it was designed and these problems will become more and more evident as time goes on. Look how easy it was for us to lose many of our freedoms, with a single law passed: The Patriot Act, that's all it took...
Matt said:
NeverMore said:
What's the best political ideology in your opinion? Democracy?Absolutism? Aristocracy? Communism? Monarchy? Anarchy? Did you create your own and wish to share perchance
?
Democratic socialism (politically democratic and economically socialist). It serves the majority and it serves the entirety. Discrepancies would be filtered through the democratic process, but the main economic equalities mandated by socialist practices would be kept intact.
That does sound good, do you know of any countries that tried this?
Matt said:
NeverMore said:
Yes you can discuss Bush here too...What's he done right? What's he done wrong? Is he going to cause the end of the world? Will he start more wars? How will history remember him as a president and as a person?
Bush is a fad, and Bush-hating is a fad. Bush is not the worst president the US has ever had; in fact, he's not even in the bottom 3. He's not evil for initiating a war; hell, Abraham Lincoln initiated a war when he didn't really need to. Bush doesn't delight in torture and murder; he just made a patriotically-driven mistake and ended up trying to salvage his dignity and reputation by perpetuating his mistaken choice for too long. But that doesn't make someone evil. If history sees Brush as truly that bad, it's only because of all the sensationalist bias that's become so popular in the contemporary world. Personally, I don't support Bush; but to claim that he's "out to destroy the main principles of democracy and civil liberties" is absolutely immature, especially in the historical context.
While I do agree that there is definitely a sensationalist bias that follows Bush with whatever he does and it's hard to actually get the facts with something like this, but the reason why I dislike Bush is not for is foreign policy which I do disagree with, but like you put very well, he made a patriotically driven mistake and perpetuated it for his entire candidacy... What he's done that makes him rank with the bottom of the barrel in my opinion, namely I like to compare him to Grant with his Whiskey Ring corruption scandals, Bush has allowed so much corruption within his circle of friends that he's done a disservice to the office. All the things he's keeping secret from the American people, all of it seems like it's covering something up and I can't stand him for being deceitful to the public, just tell us what the hell is going on Bush! But what worries me is if this type of sensationalist bias will continue to every following president, think about it, we live in the age of the Daily Show and the internet, if your president your going to be made fun of and your every mistake will be made much more evident than it ever has before in the past, which worries me