theablekingathelstan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2021
- Messages
- 648
- Reaction score
- 100
Lol. She clearly is a malicious person. and you enable it.
When you collude out of some conical dislike or aversion of me then it’s grand.
Ah, you are evasive. In this case it does look like an admission that you fabricated your claim. Not even a feeble attempt to support it.
More evasion, though a cone shaped dislike is a puzzle.conical dislike
Ask a narcissist if they are dependable and they will say, I'm the most responsible person you know, you can always count on me. And they can be. But when you put them to the test, narcissists seem to wiggle out of accountability.Ah, you are evasive
i'd pay to see you two in the same room
Saxon history buff. Considering it’s unethical to online diagnose people I’m amused at your brazen lack of morals despite being so kind. And by arbitrarily asserting they don’t apply to me since I’m not up to much supposedly (when you solely get to determine peoples value).he calls himself a king
and an able king at that
(my ex narc called himself a commander)
kings don't have to answer to anyone
I’m a history buff, mofo.
(that does not count as a "hitler")
he calls himself a king
and an able king at that
(my ex narc called himself a commander)
kings don't have to answer to anyone
Total nonsense. Your views are your own. They don’t represent realityI was kind of thinking that too. It's not the referencing of a certain king that is the issue by itself - it's the identifying with a king, combined with the general character/views.
Isn’t it the norm not to online diagnose people?Your insults have been tolerated so far but if you are going to start pushing them to that extreme then you will get a little vacation on your way out.
Enter your email address to join: