BeyondShy said:
This pretty much sums it up for me too.
BeyondShy said:
VanillaCreme said:There's not going to be an argument, although that's probably what you want.
VanillaCreme said:There's not going to be an argument, although that's probably what you want.
VanillaCreme said:There's not going to be any argument or debate about it.
Xpendable said:VanillaCreme said:There's not going to be any argument or debate about it.
I can't believe this sentence comes from a forum moderator. You can't label every discussion or disagreement as "arguing". How are we supposed to interchange views and opinions then? I just should write posts that agree with everyone? None of you has given me a response that can be used to grow my understanding. None of you has pointed out the flaws of my arguments (which they can totally be flawed). I like to generate discussion to expand topics, I like to deconstruct things instead of just accepting them; that's one of the things that make going in this life. You may see it as just wanting to argue but what value do you get from avoiding the questions? Just because we're arguing doesn't mean that is directed towards hostility. Is every debate a secret plot to offend some one else? Truly?
VanillaCreme said:You want to argue about everything. You even disagree on things you've previously agreed upon in a thread.
Xpendable said:I mean "argument" as a response based on facts, not "fighting". Enough with the semantic dishonesty. I prefer that someone tells me why I'm wrong instead of some childish eye rolling.
ardour said:Xpendable said:I mean "argument" as a response based on facts, not "fighting". Enough with the semantic dishonesty. I prefer that someone tells me why I'm wrong instead of some childish eye rolling.
The OP's video wasn't meant to spark debate but encourage those receptive to the message. It's no surprise you're comments aren't going down well (Hint: you're shitting over someone's efforts to cheer people up; it would be more appropriate to argue those points on another thread.)
ardour said:Xpendable said:I mean "argument" as a response based on facts, not "fighting". Enough with the semantic dishonesty. I prefer that someone tells me why I'm wrong instead of some childish eye rolling.
The OP's video wasn't meant to spark debate but encourage those receptive to the message. It's no surprise you're comments aren't welcome (Hint: you're shitting over someone's efforts to cheer people up; it would be more appropriate to argue these points on another thread.)
Xpendable said:I totally see that. But it's such a sin to try to understand from were that encouragement comes from and why you can be receptive or not to the message on the video? I want to comprehend stuff, not just accept them. Questioning isn't the same a shitting over.
Enter your email address to join: