TropicalStarfish
Well-known member
Transactional analysis/psychology is Bullsh*t man. You're not a fool. If two deal-making types are looking to make a deal, cross paths with each other, are attracted to each other, and each has something the other wants; then, yes, they can strike a nice deal and get along just fine.I feel like a fool because I honestly thought relationships would be completely different. I didn’t understand relationships are transactional. I provide this, you provide that. Doesn’t feel like love to me. Probably the hardest pill I've had to swallow is that I probably wont find my idealistic partner and I should just accept that and find happiness alone.
It's a matter of perspective (a thing that is influenced by circumstance, mind-set, culture, and even the time and place one exists in).
We can easily turn our noses up at Disney movie romance, and say, that doesn't happen, that's not real. And we can be right. But that doesn't mean doubling down on the idea we are biological machines; essentially mindless creatures that are simply looking to strike the most advantageous deal.
You can be horribly depressed, and have misfortune abound, and look at a beautiful rose, and want to throw up. Or, you can be on top of the world, and see that same rose, and have an understanding of it, as a thing of beauty, and a focal point for the expression of The Universe.
That's my take. Transactional analysis isn't my thing. Sure if you zoom in far enough to a rose, you see the individual cells, then you see the DNA, and then you can say, "pfft! Just a bunch C's A's G's and T's, what a crock!"
But there's other ways of looking at it. (Ways that I think are primarily more optimal). One usually doesn't, 'love their dog,' because it's a useful and advantageous, 'tool.' People usually love their dogs because they are fluffy, and adorable, and cute (except when they misbehave.)
Love is love. Many ways to look at a relationship.
Last edited: