MentatsGhoul
Well-known member
nerdygirl said:AJ_ said:it's a known fact that women get 100s of messages per month on dating sites maybe even per day, so there's no shortage of choice.
I just wanted to be sure people know that SOME women may get hundreds of messages per month... but there are a lot who DON'T. One day, I'd like to find the jerk posting these false statistics and slap him/ her around.
Why? I REALLY don't get why people are offended by that kind of stuff, and I've never gotten a good answer.
Obviously hundreds is an exaggeration, obviously not all women etc. But, it's an undeniable fact that women get approached more, get more messages online etc than men of approximately equivalent or even higher levels of attractiveness. Why is that offensive? It doesn't mean men have it worse, it doesn't mean there's something wrong with women who don't get messaged, it just means that statistically speaking women get more attention in the dating world, and thus men might end up feeling insecure or disadvantaged.
And before you hop into the "it makes women who don't get approached as often feel bad" argument
a) There's a number of reasons a woman might not get approached/messaged as much, even if they are attractive, from seeming unapproachable to actually getting approached but not being able to tell when they are. It doesn't necessarily mean that if someone doesn't get approached, there's something wrong with her. That's just something people infer themselves
b) As cruel as this sounds... why should I care? Just reverse the roles for a moment, and replace it with a female issue. Say... someone points out that men tend to cheat more. How would you feel if every time a woman pointed out that she was having trouble with her boyfriends ending up being unfaithful, some guy would jump out and say "Not all men cheat, I'm a man that's been cheated on, does that mean there's something wrong with me, you really shouldn't talk about this issue because I feel personally affected"?