Phaedron said:
theraab said:
True Love...because if you pick the money, you are not only keeping yourself from true love, but also the other person - that's just selfish.
As an added bonus, whenever you argued, you could always say "I gave up $5,000,000 for you, you really need to let me go play golf" (or whatever).
No, I would just be keeping her from me. There isn't anyone who wouldn't be happier with someone else. Meanwhile with 5 million, I could spend at least half of it making the world a better place. What is one mans love compared to the ability to save thousands of children from starving? To quote Spock "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few."
What is true love anyway, but an impossible dream of meeting someone who is completely perfect for you, so that you don't have to work on anything. Meanwhile there are native Americans who are happy with prearranged marriage and know how to make it work.
So tell me again what is the selfish choice? Being able to lord it over them that you gave up $5,000,000 so you can do what you want sounds pretty selfish to me...
I was kidding about lording it over her. But anyway, the question was "your true love" not "your ideal partner who may not be interested in you" - love is a two way street, you would be depriving her of it if you took the money.
Your sentiment to make the world a better place with the money is noble, however, you would be making the world a better place by finding your true love (even if it was only better for you and her) - I suppose on this part I'm being selfish because I would choose me and her over the world - but make no apologies for that, I would always make that decisions. Your sense of sacrifice is noble, though.
And I don't think that true love is someone who is completely perfect for you - the latter just doesn't exist for anyone, the former is just someone who you are willing to overlook the imperfections of.