Punisher said:
It's not my "personal beliefs" it's what Jesus said that makes Christianity, and he did not say 'homosexuallity is wrong'.
My "personal beliefs" (what Jesus said) represents Christianity, not Christians.
But there is no true Christianity- there are just many versions of it that different Christian religions construct based on their readings of a whole lot of vague mythological texts from random people that were put into a book.
Christianity is made mainly from people taking vague stories and acting as if there is supernatural power in them.
It's extremely common for people to somehow believe what they are reading from the magic books is the true word of magic intended by their superhero creator that other sects are misunderstanding, but the point remains that these religious texts are not straightforward, with many parts not even really making sense taken together, and are very easy to use to prove all kinds of uncompatible stances, so everyone gets to go on forever claiming their view is the correct one.
No one named Jesus ever wrote anything in the first place, so saying "what Jesus said" is also kind of useless. If such a person did exist, the stories of what he said are written by people who didn't all actually even claim to be there when they were said, so it's essentially hearsay. You will never be able to know "what Jesus said", even if he did exist or was a magic god.
Also, this Jesus is suppossed to have said that he did not come to abolish the law or the prophets, so apparently what Jesus's message entails according to that version of the story is also something you can get by reading the stories in the old testament. "I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished"
And to top that off, most of what became of Christianity comes through Paul, a guy who never even saw that a Jesus actually existed, and who seems heavily influenced in thinking from the mystery religions of the time. The reason his version was most popularized has to do with the fact that he made the message which was originally just for a sect of Jews something non Jewish. Without Paul Christianity would have died out.
The idea that there is one form of correct Christianity that can be proven to be so over all the others is simply not true. Christianity is like all the other myths and you can form countless religions out of it, and people have been doing just that.
But it's very healthy for the religion that it is so vague and contradictory, because that's what keeps people too preoccupied with inner religion debates to ever research whether or not the book should be listened to in the first place.