How many of you would abstain?

Loneliness, Depression & Relationship Forum

Help Support Loneliness, Depression & Relationship Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Iceman1978 said:
You talk about this as though abstinence is a choice. For some people it isn't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_celibacy

I seem to have touched a sensitive nerve for many people with this post.

There are certain conditions assumed at the offset of my question, I was asking people if they have chosen to abstain, whether or not it has helped them in loneliness, there can be no variable in that question for involuntary celibacy, which I myself am also in the category of, even having made the decision prior I have no prospect if I wanted to be sexual to do so. Not only this but I'm not only speaking about sex, by abstain I mean in general, to sex, alcohol, drugs, anything that can allow a person to feel happy without having people around them to help them feel happy.

I agree with nearly every posed alternative view, as I haven't stated anything to be the right or wrong way to do things, I haven't said that sex is the only way to love, I haven't said you can only love a set amount of people, I haven't said that romantic love is lesser or greater than plutonic love, as well I'm speaking from a practical perspective of which human beings might understand reality, I follow the Copenhagen interpretation to the universe, so I'm not implying that things have to be one way or another, but within the confines of the question there are certain terms in which I was basing myself from.

I really meant no offense, I'm also not in my current situation able to have a sexual partner, had I not become celibate it would be irrelevant and I would be in the exact same situation, but because I'm celibate it's allowed me to feel far less lonely than I would wishing I had a girlfriend, and ceasing that wish led to accepting that having no friends is where I am in life, and it brings me very little pain anymore. I was hoping to discuss this idea with a few people, anyone who might want to consider my theories, but I don't think posting about celibacy was a good idea on my part on a forum devoted to loneliness. My apologies.
 
Oh I wasn't offended at all. I've accepted the fact that nobody will ever want me. I accepted it years ago and have tried to seek out happiness through other things and not get caught up in the belief that I need to be in a relationship to be happy. There are times when I struggle (such as now) but overall it doesn't bother me any more.

I wasn't upset, just clarifying that for some people being abstinent isn't a choice.
 
It has to be applied love though really doesn't it?

No problem about causing offence it clear you mean none. I have a friend I haven’t seen a while who became heavily into Buddhist thought. So I've read a bit of Buddhist writing here and there and its sort of appealing in a fluffy "there are no answers only questions sort of way". I found some interest in topics on materialism, how aspiring to the acquisition of wealth and material objects provides only a short term relief from our more fundamental problems. It made me realise I spent more time just looking at my DVD collection than actually watching it and I sold it all!

I think half way though the book though I just thought "oh shut up you damned hippy!" :) Seriously though I just found it too... just sit down ...relax, don’t stress... don't go looking for answers to the big questions... you're just energy and part of universe". It tries to continually deconstruct the concept of the self and I just thought "I don't have the time to be Buddhist; I have too much **** to deal with!" Ultimately I couldn't resolve the conflicting message that on the one hand nothing really matters and that we are all just energy with on the other it going to describe a correct, healthy and worthy way to live. What value is a concept of good an evil in a universe of just energy?

I think at its core, like any religion it has some fundamental truths and wisdom, but how do you apply it? Life is going on around you and you only get one shot, it’s good to feel frustration, people need self drive to achieve happiness. Better than just sitting around not caring as its all meaningless anyway, it just seems to prescribe letting go and giving up (I know thats only my interpretation and it isn't actually suggesting that but thats how it left me feeling). Even if that’s true I'd rather sustain the illusion.

So how do you apply it? How do you apply the love that you have for everyone? Without trying to offend, I read a few of your posts about how you love all people equally and I find them well meaning but ultimately empty and just words which is how I find a lot of Buddhist thought, well meaning but empty. I'd rather love my family, with all my heart and in a real sense, not just with empty words and then afterwards see what I have left for everyone else because you tend to find there’s still plenty of love to go round. I see true happiness in an elderly couple with a family around them at Christmas, a reflection of many years of hard work and love toward those that matter most; I believe that is true definition of love and something to aspire to. There’s no happiness in reacting against your natural tendencies or sexual desires, it’s about taking them and channelling them in a positive way to a positive end, rather than running from them and working at convincing yourself its better that way.

Well that’s my view anyway; I hope we can agree to disagree. :)
 
So how do you apply it? How do you apply the love that you have for everyone? Without trying to offend, I read a few of your posts about how you love all people equally and I find them well meaning but ultimately empty and just words which is how I find a lot of Buddhist thought, well meaning but empty. I'd rather love my family, with all my heart and in a real sense, not just with empty words and then afterwards see what I have left for everyone else because you tend to find there’s still plenty of love to go round. I see true happiness in an elderly couple with a family around them at Christmas, a reflection of many years of hard work and love toward those that matter most; I believe that is true definition of love and something to aspire to. There’s no happiness in reacting against your natural tendencies or sexual desires, it’s about taking them and channelling them in a positive way to a positive end, rather than running from them and working at convincing yourself its better that way.
right on brother!
I agree with that and would give you a rep point for it if you didn't already have so many more than I do ;)

ah what the hell, share the love =P
 
Walley said:
right on brother!
I agree with that and would give you a rep point for it if you didn't already have so many more than I do ;)

ah what the hell, share the love =P

Ha thanks, just disagreed with you on the suicide thread too (but only slightly), glad you didn't read that first. :p
 
Ha thanks, just disagreed with you on the suicide thread too (but only slightly), glad you didn't read that first.
haha, that's fine! everyone is free to disagree! (even if they are wrong ;p)
if everyone here just agreeed with everything I said then I would probably have to find another forum lol.
 
floatsamjetsam said:
I've found that not targetting any one person, in a romantic or sexual nature, allows my heart a pretty near limitless reserve of love for everyone else in the world.

Funny, it sounds like something out of the Jedi code.

But to answer the question, I find that when I am not with a 'significant other' I feel less inclined to have any emotional connection to the world. I think being in a relationship where you share yourself with someone (not just sex, but it is part of it) ups me wanting to be a part of others around me as well.
 
The Good Citizen said:
It has to be applied love though really doesn't it?

No problem about causing offence it clear you mean none. I have a friend I haven’t seen a while who became heavily into Buddhist thought. So I've read a bit of Buddhist writing here and there and its sort of appealing in a fluffy "there are no answers only questions sort of way". I found some interest in topics on materialism, how aspiring to the acquisition of wealth and material objects provides only a short term relief from our more fundamental problems. It made me realise I spent more time just looking at my DVD collection than actually watching it and I sold it all!

I think half way though the book though I just thought "oh shut up you damned hippy!" :) Seriously though I just found it too... just sit down ...relax, don’t stress... don't go looking for answers to the big questions... you're just energy and part of universe". It tries to continually deconstruct the concept of the self and I just thought "I don't have the time to be Buddhist; I have too much **** to deal with!" Ultimately I couldn't resolve the conflicting message that on the one hand nothing really matters and that we are all just energy with on the other it going to describe a correct, healthy and worthy way to live. What value is a concept of good an evil in a universe of just energy?

I think at its core, like any religion it has some fundamental truths and wisdom, but how do you apply it? Life is going on around you and you only get one shot, it’s good to feel frustration, people need self drive to achieve happiness. Better than just sitting around not caring as its all meaningless anyway, it just seems to prescribe letting go and giving up (I know thats only my interpretation and it isn't actually suggesting that but thats how it left me feeling). Even if that’s true I'd rather sustain the illusion.

So how do you apply it? How do you apply the love that you have for everyone? Without trying to offend, I read a few of your posts about how you love all people equally and I find them well meaning but ultimately empty and just words which is how I find a lot of Buddhist thought, well meaning but empty. I'd rather love my family, with all my heart and in a real sense, not just with empty words and then afterwards see what I have left for everyone else because you tend to find there’s still plenty of love to go round. I see true happiness in an elderly couple with a family around them at Christmas, a reflection of many years of hard work and love toward those that matter most; I believe that is true definition of love and something to aspire to. There’s no happiness in reacting against your natural tendencies or sexual desires, it’s about taking them and channelling them in a positive way to a positive end, rather than running from them and working at convincing yourself its better that way.

Well that’s my view anyway; I hope we can agree to disagree. :)

You've taken quite the offensive stance towards my character, regardless of your intention to do so. Well, my empty words, can be only that. It's actions that prove character, and show love, but there aren't many actions I can do over a virtual landscape to assist people in their lives. I volunteer at a local soup kitchen, give all the change I have in my pockets to homeless people, visit an old folks home frequently, and try to help people with addiction.

We can agree to disagree, but before you discredit Buddhism so greatly, without understanding it. I just want to explain a few things..

Any idea that you got that life is meaningless from Buddhism, was written or told to you by someone who knows nothing about Buddhism, not one single thing about it. The entire point of Buddhism, is to understand the meaning of everything, rather than just a handful of things that make you happy or sad.

The next point, would be that Buddhism, is a combination of learning to love all the worlds inhabitants by following a strict moral code that you eventually follow regardless through meditation, as well as it is learning to understand that nothing is permanent. The very moment we are born, we have already died, time is not real, identity is not real, everything becomes, and withers away. It's learning to accept that, and see the beauty in it rather than the negativity, that Buddhism tries to teach. People are so afraid of being sad, that they avoid sad feelings at all costs and desire so greatly to be happy, that they clutch to happy thoughts and actions with dear life, pretending to themselves that happiness can last forever, that it's a permanent state one can obtain through hard work. True it's very possible to make yourself happy by doing things you love, or learning to love the things you do, but happiness fades, as does sadness they are only emotions and should not be held in such high regard.

We fail to see what's actually happening in the moment, because we spend time focusing on the past which is no longer real, and has nothing to do with reality, it is misleading and brings pain or aversion to our lives, the future, which has not even been real, where we live in a world that does not and will not exist, and we fail to live in reality, in the present moment. The moment something becomes, it is destroyed so that it might become anew, cells in your body change constantly, you are a new person before you even know who you are.

Buddhism is about being joyful and full of love, not running after something that we can never own (happiness), not about being lazy do-nothings, not about being a hippie, it's about experiencing your life before it's gone, and learning to love every moment of it.

If Buddhism does nothing for people, I would wonder how it allowed me to kick a severe amphetamine habit, ended my alcoholism, allowed me to quit chain-smoking both tobacco and marijuana, drinking caffeine, watching pornography and lying, all within the course of a two week period, as well as working heavily on my education, and forcing me to get a job and start doing volunteer work. I would think if Buddhism was what you believed it to be, I would still be doing drugs, and laying on my couch all day.

I'm not overly hurt by your deconstruction of my religion or my character, as I know it wasn't solely your intent to hurt my feelings, but you did come into this assuming yourself to be of greater value and intelligence than me, that is indisputable, and I would caution you to avoid that, there is enough of it in the world.
 
I never thought of my abstinance coming from loneliness. Just never craved it after menopause. I have gone without for so long, the desire is no longer there. That was not the case when I was younger. I was a raging animal for it, all the time. But loneliness does dullen it a lot. Feeling detached from everything.
 
If I were in a relationship, a good, possitive relationship... I'd have much more love for the rest of mankind. ******* regularly would put me in a better mood and I'd no longer have feelings of frustration. I'm quite sure it would work like this.

Anyways, no way I would abstain on any circumstances. Sex is a need which has to be satisfied in order to function as best as possible. It improves health, mind, mood... and more, probably.
 
I have abstained from many things over short periods of time as personal experiments, and I think depending on the person you are, what your needs are, your level of enlightenment and many other factors would determine whether or not abstinence from sex, or food, or whatever was rewarding. When I was younger, and I abstained from alcohol, I was frustrated at not being able to have fun with my mates. But today, eventhough I am still made fun of for being a teetotaler, I am completely at peace with my decision. I find that I am able to have fun without alcohol (as it turns out I am just as silly sober as I am drunk) and at the end of a drinking party, I am more than happy to drive everyone home safely =).

I think this whole topic of abstinence really just depends on each individual. I know people who have become bitter without having enough sexual gratification, but I also know people who have gone without sex for 30 years and are the sweetest, most giving people. I don't judge anyone whichever category they fall into.

And I think this was a good question to pose floatsamjetsam. Eventhough there appears to be a debate about it, I think you've given us all things to think about, whether or not we all agree or disagree with you =)
 
I'm not a big fan of abstinence.

But then I'm not a big fan of meth, either.

So I guess, kids, the moral of this story is...

EVERYTHING IN MODERATION.

Except meth. Don't do meth.
 
I'm 36 and still a virgin. But I'm not abstaining. Nor am I celibate. I just haven't found a woman who will share the experience of sex with me. I actually think I have quite a high libido, which makes it worse. I've been told for most of my life that the only way I will experience anything sexual or intimate is if I pay for it. But to me. The emotional experience of sex is just as important as the physical. And simply reducing it to something to purchase totally removes any affectionate emotion from it, in my opinion. There doesn't have to be love, but at least with someone who cares ... but even therapists have said that the chances of me finding someone who'll have sex with me are around zero.

I don't drink alcohol. Well, except for maybe a glass or 2 of wine over summer. But I've never been drunk, and have no interest in ever being drunk. I actually don't like the taste of most alcohol ... never liked any of the beers I've tried, vodka, whiskey. I've copped a lot for not drinking. It's pretty much considered 'un-Australian' not to drink. But it's my choice.
 
Cucuboth said:
I'm 36 and still a virgin. But I'm not abstaining. Nor am I celibate. I just haven't found a woman who will share the experience of sex with me. I actually think I have quite a high libido, which makes it worse. I've been told for most of my life that the only way I will experience anything sexual or intimate is if I pay for it. But to me. The emotional experience of sex is just as important as the physical. And simply reducing it to something to purchase totally removes any affectionate emotion from it, in my opinion. There doesn't have to be love, but at least with someone who cares ... but even therapists have said that the chances of me finding someone who'll have sex with me are around zero.

I don't drink alcohol. Well, except for maybe a glass or 2 of wine over summer. But I've never been drunk, and have no interest in ever being drunk. I actually don't like the taste of most alcohol ... never liked any of the beers I've tried, vodka, whiskey. I've copped a lot for not drinking. It's pretty much considered 'un-Australian' not to drink. But it's my choice.

For the first 6 months I was in OZ, I didn't have a single friend. No one wanted to hang out with me after class because I didn't drink. It wasn't because we didn't have anything else in common because we did. I started drinking because I was so lonely for companionship and suddenly I was doing something sociable every other night.

Hat's off to you for not succumbing. Its not easy to do down under! :D
 
floatsamjetsam said:
I'm not overly hurt by your deconstruction of my religion or my character, as I know it wasn't solely your intent to hurt my feelings, but you did come into this assuming yourself to be of greater value and intelligence than me, that is indisputable, and I would caution you to avoid that, there is enough of it in the world.

Come on don't be so prickly...

I read a little Buddhism and it didn't do anything for me for the reasons stated. I did make the point that it was only my interpretation and that’s how it left me feeling personally. I also acknowledged that "at its core, like any religion it has some fundamental truths and wisdom" it just isn't for me much beyond that. I was turned on by the questions it posed but continually left frustrated by its seeming assertion that there are no answers, maybe it was the self help element by telling me things I already instinctively knew, I don’t know, it just wasn’t for me. Reading it back, my tone may have been overly flippant in so much as I appreciate it doesn’t promote sitting around not caring, so that was probably unfair.

If you have overcome those problems in your life then I'm impressed (genuinely). I would only argue that Buddhism didn't allow you to overcome them, you allowed yourself. You reached a point where you were open to change and sought it and Buddhism provided you with a framework within which you could make a change, for someone else it might be some other means but change ultimately comes from the individual, I think even Buddhism would teach you that.

I know from memory the Buddha was a prince called Siddhartha Gautama who at 29 had an awakening when seeing poverty and went into the wilderness for several years and mediated toward a state of enlightenment (amazing what you remember from school). So if you managed to turn your life around in two weeks, then again I would say Buddhism only provided the catalyst for you to sort your own life out. Either way, you did it and all credit to you. For the charitable work you do, well to me that is "applied love", that’s making a difference. As to the comment "there aren't many actions I can do over a virtual landscape to assist people in their lives" well I disagree, you can listen to what people have to say and offer empathy and beyond that you can offer constructive advice to help them help themselves. Again this is for me a better example of applied love. You sound like you have been through a lot and personally I think you could draw on that experience in the advice you give, it could make a difference to people.

I still don't see promoting celibacy to spread love more evenly as a logical view point. It immediately strikes me as being exclusive because it can't work for the human race as a whole (it would cease to exist) and being all-inclusive has to be a tenet of any religious thought in my view. Better still, with your new found purpose and understanding and being a stronger person in general, don't you see the possibility in meeting someone, loving them and having a child together to instil in them the same values that you have found? It would be a chance to perpetuate that love and understanding down to the next generation. Intuitively (for you have read far more), I think that would be more in keeping with Buddhist teaching; to love and to teach and be reborn and continue even if the self withers away. It would be a shame if what you have studied has closed you off from that possibility. I always think it’s a shame when decent people with values choose to not have children for it’s an opportunity missed to create another decent human being in the world. For every opportunity missed, another child is born into a life of bigotry and hate and everything you and I would both despise, there has to be plenty of new people born who can provide an alternative to that. So I think you should still keep an open mind to that in the future.

Lastly, I think I actually only wrote one line relating to you, where I found the posts proclaiming love for everyone were well meaning but a little empty, so there’s really no need to take my post too personally. I don't know you or anything about you so how could I consider myself superior to you in anyway? Why would I ever want to rank everyone I met into some league table of intelligence and value anyway, that isn’t me at all. That wasn't my intent so if it was taken as such, I apologise.

Love you. x

;)
 
I agree that not constantly beating yourself up for not being in a relationship/having lots of kinky sex is a good thing. I started doing this - not expecting to be in a relationship and not seeing being single as some sort of horrific failure - and I'm a lot happier, and I think that's the best mental state to have going into a relationship anyway.

However I think talking about love as if it's a quantifiable substance that you have to ration out is too detached from reality for me, though.
 
Cucuboth - Any therapist who said that to a client wants striking off ! If they have a crystal ball 'that good' they would be looking up the lottery numbers and not earning a living giving such wrong/damaging opinions.

what was said to you about chances are around zero is absolutely crap.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top