Maggie Thatcher RIP

Loneliness, Depression & Relationship Forum

Help Support Loneliness, Depression & Relationship Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
A woman that girls can look up to, but thanks to a smeer job by the media , they'd rather admire Lady GAGA.

There are parties being held in George Square Glasgow at the Iron Ladies demise.

Britain has shown the world its true nature.
 
Poguesy said:
Then unpopular Argentine dictators should think twice before invading British territories for the sake of a populist vote.

Oh for God's sake, British territories? What business did Britain have in the 20th Century maintaining claims to islands off the coast of Argentina?
 
rdor said:
Oh for God's sake, British territories? What business did Britain have maintaining claims to islands off the coast of Argentina, let alone making war over it?

SHHHHH!!!

You know as well as I do that everyone's anxiously awaiting:

The Falklands II: Electric Boogaloo

GodsavetheQueen.

:cool:
 
Wait, is she compared to Reagan, or Dubya?

Because it sounds a hell of a lot like you're describing the US recession, thanks to George W Bush.
 
rdor said:
Poguesy said:
Then unpopular Argentine dictators should think twice before invading British territories for the sake of a populist vote.

Oh for God's sake, British territories? What business did Britain have in the 20th Century maintaining claims to islands off the coast of Argentina?

People can bark about this all they want but the fact is the vast majority of the islanders voted to remain British (only three voted against and no doubt for a laugh).


Dissident said:
Poguesy said:
The unions were out of control, too powerful and were throwing around industrial action every five minutes. All this with British industry already on its knees.

Out of whose control? The businesses? The people sure didn't mind.

Poguesy said:
The mines presented more expenditure than income, so why keep them open?

No, the mining companies just didn't want to give cost-of-living adjustments and employees didn't want to stand for it. If it was just that she wouldn't have referred to them as the "enemy within." Instead she enacted a typical right-wing response: "Do what we want you to do, or else." Countless non-violent protesters were locked up and beaten to a pulp.

Poguesy said:
If Maggie's economic policies were that harsh why has no leading politician changed it since?

Because corporate money makes the world go 'round. Tyranny is a whole lot easier to keep now, too. All you have to do is hire the best psychologists in the field to help write your propaganda pieces and establish air superiority in case of an insurrection.

Poguesy said:
There's always going to casualties but she got Britain back on the map and revived a ruined economy.

o rly? The problems that she claimed to alleviate had already subsided by 1978. By enacting a variety of regressive taxes she only widened the income gap.

You know, it's amazing how far right-wingers will take "privatize success, socialize failure." If a company makes all kinds of profit, then the leaders of said company are held up as champions. If a company begins to lag behind as a whole, the bottom rung employees - the people with the least amount of actual influence on the company's operation - are suddenly to blame for executive error. For being the staunch social Darwinists they are, shouldn't they advocate throwing failed executives out on the street? Oh, that's right, the people who run companies are of a rank and file above the rest. They live at a higher standard by virtue of existence.

The trade unions were way too powerful. Throwing strikes every five minutes and finishing off the ruined industries. Coal strikes that reduced a nation to a three day working week, working by candlelight. Socialist crap.

And yes the mines were closed due to financial reasons. Arthur Scargill campaigned/striked for those higher wages but in doing so finished it off. An industry all ready losing money and constant strikes losing day after day of trade.

Profitable coal mines were done for long before Thatcher came in.


Let me also add I do feel for what it must have been like for the miners. I admit they were left in an industrial wasteland.


Dissident said:
The UK version of Ronald Reagan as far as I can tell.

I would say more intelligent than Reagan but they got on rather well and shared many values.

Made quite the cute couple :p
 
Poguesy said:
The trade unions were way too powerful. Throwing strikes every five minutes and finishing off the ruined industries. Coal strikes that reduced a nation to a three day working week, working by candlelight. Socialist crap.

Well if the companies didn't exploit their workers the unions wouldn't exist in the first place. The people you are defending are the same people that, a century ago, allowed children to be crushed in cave-ins and mangled in machinery, put low-grade meat in food, and dumped waste in rivers, all in the name of profitability. I don't know if you realize it, but profit is not very high on the list of moral imperatives.

The coal strikes didn't reduce the nation to a three day working week, that was a decision made by the government acting at the behest of corporate interests.

Poguesy said:
And yes the mines were closed due to financial reasons. Arthur Scargill campaigned/striked for those higher wages but in doing so finished it off. An industry all ready losing money and constant strikes losing day after day of trade.

Profitable coal mines were done for long before Thatcher came in.

They stopped being profitable because the company executives didn't want to come off it. I have seen first-hand what happens when a company's president or other executive staff take the lion's share of the company's funds. There are countless examples of company holders draining the life out of a company, then complaining about the lack of profitability.

My first boss ran his printing company into the ground because he wanted a mansion, a speed boat, a big, gas-guzzling truck - and yet there was a massive hole in the side of the building from where he had some doors knocked down to bring in a new press. Instead of spending the few hundred dollars to put a garage gate up, he left the hole covered with cheap plywood - until someone got the idea to saw through it and make off with half the equipment. Not to mention that, prior to that, various pieces of equipment (such as the image setter, which converted digital print jobs to film negatives) had started to fail and he had left the company without any funds to make the necessary repairs.

This very same thing happens over and over and over again. It's what happened to Hostess, AIG, EA and so many other companies across the spectrum. So you don't get to "live high on the hog" as we say then complain that a company isn't making money. If a company you're in charge of isn't making money, it's your fault and you should be the one to take a pay cut.

Poguesy said:
Let me also add I do feel for what it must have been like for the miners. I admit they were left in an industrial wasteland.

Well yeah. That's what they wanted. Keep them in line by cutting their pay, enacting regressive tax policies, and forcing them to live in squalor and the balance will remain in the favor of the corporations. This is rightist economics 101.

Just because conservatives talk about money and economics all the time that doesn't mean they're any good at it. Thatcher doubled the unemployment rate and created numerous deficits. She also effectively destroyed the export economy of the UK.

Poguesy said:
I would say more intelligent than Reagan but they got on rather well and shared many values.

I would hope so. Reagan was quoted as saying that trees are responsible for more pollution than cars. What an idiot.
 
Ding dong, the witch is dead.

And so is the British steel industry.


Totally late post in a thread that's now old news, BUT THE THREAD ISN'T POINTLESSLY LOCKED LIKE SOME RANDOM FRESH THREADS HERE so there.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top