SophiaGrace said:
Firebird you buy into a dogma. Seriously. A negative dogma which villanizes 50% of the human race. Women.
I am not a villan. I am a human being and just because I don't do wh at you want doesn't mean i'm a bad person.
Maybe their are women who make their own living and don't care, but let's be honest, the typical women out there, are not. They are focused on BS like ambition and what your job situation/financial situation. Don't lie to yourself.
Probably similar to asking humans whether they think inner beauty is more important than outer beauty. I think we heard that one before....
Definitely not the women you see in the subway or streets. If you dress like a poor dude (because you don't have enough money to get decent cloths), be assured no women is going to give you a second look.
I've tested this before, when I dress poorly and walk into a mall, I get no attention. But when I dress in the manner that indicates I might have a stable job (at least), the attention or second glances I get increases by many factors.
If you are only going for a guy who has a job and a car and financial stability, what's the reason? Are you working yourself? It's funny that the women who demand this from men are usually not working themselves, just looking for someone to support them, or they have 0 to offer themselves. You always hear people saying "what do they have to offer". Well, besides their heart and soul, what do you think? Okay you want a man to be financially stable, so what do you as a woman have to offer? your body? Are you caught in a superiority complex? I'd tell those women to kindly GTFO.
What is the point? Are you in love with the idea of a man being financially stable, in love with his money, or in love with him as a human being? There's a fine line.
I don't care if a woman has a job or not, I like someone for who they are. Women seem to like men for what they have, not as a person, and that's pretty awful. You're going to bring up the biology argument and say women need security so they can raise children. Guess what? Not everybody is going to have children. Some people don't want children, just a partner. So from that angle your justification for women being materialistic and focusing on money fails. You'll say that I'm crazy for saying this because people need to survive. That's not the issue. The issue is being superficial. Being hypocritical. Making it the end all be all. Then you see a woman saying she can't find a nice guy, but when you examine her standards the reason stands clear.
Women are also too quick to judge and say "we'll he has no job so he's just looking for someone to support him". NO ladies. You are wrong, sorry. I don't have a job and I am not looking for a woman to support me. AT ALL. So, you are unfairly judging ME personally.
It's kinda like the jewish question, if you say there's a freakishly large amount of jews in top positions of power everyone calls you a nazi who wants to burn people in ovens. It's a very ridiculous way to act and a perfect example of strawman'ing. The way women judge about this is similar to the mind of a 5 year old child who gets the "no talking to strangers" lesson.
So when you say all unemployed men are losers who just want a woman to be their mother and support them you are wrong on all levels.
Expecting a potential partner to be financially stable while having none of those same qualities, or nothing to offer yourself also makes you a bigot.
I don't consider myself a bigot because hey! whaddaya know, I don't expect my opposite gender to have something I don't have myself.
Any sane person will understand the point I make because it's really not that hard to see. Logic is a powerful tool.
I'm against all forms of injustice. Being judged unfairly is one of them.
One person here said I was just as bad for wanting a woman of my own race and body type but didn't seem to have a problem with women having nothing to "offer" themselves but expecting the world from men.
Because I'm not an egotistical person like most of the masses I don't try to justify immoral thinking and behavior, as so many people seem to do. If I was saying most men are evil for judging by looks everybody would agree with me and not raise a stink. But when it's women everyone throws out the strawman and shoots me down. If the one-sidedness and hypocrisy in that scenario isn't visible to you, I wonder what is?
Seems like relationships today are formed based on "what you have to offer", where in the past relationships started more naturally and all flaws and differences were accepted and looked past. Not anymore though. That's so unnatrual.
Again, I'm not an egotistical person so I realize that if I am treating others unfairly there will be reprecussions. Women are the total opposite though, they believe it's justified for them to stereotype out guys and not deal with any repreccusions. Well I'm here to say sorry ladies, if you treat others unfairly someone will eventually call you out on it. Like I do. But it makes you angry deep down because you know it's not right, but you continue to do it.
If you only go for someone based on what they have you don't love THEM.
You love what they HAVE.
End of story. That's not debateable.
If you go through life not having someone, and in some cases never having someone ever, you do everything in your power and nothing works. It doesn't matter what you do. Nothing ever works, one day you're going to look in the mirror and say maybe it's not me that has a problem, could it be women? That's where things take a turn for the worst. That's where you really feel like you are forced out.