EveWasFramed
Well-known member
An online female friend of mine asked me for a bit of advice recently. I admit that I understood and was baffled at the same time.
She's been on a few dates with a guy that she's known for a bit (nothing serious, just the occasional activity she explained). Apparently, the guy has made it clear that he'd like to have something "more" with her (like maybe "dating" status). She went on to tell me about some of the things that keeps her from being more than just friends with the guy. A couple of them really baffled me (I guess everyone is different) and some of them...well, I can easily see why she would keep the guy in the "friend zone."
She said that she'd mentioned a couple of her concerns to him, but he just kept on doing whatever it was that caused her concern. She said that she didn't want to get serious with someone when she knew full well that some of the stuff that bothered her would just eventually cause her to dislike the guy.
Her question to me, was whether or not she should be 100% honest with him, and tell him about the things that keep him in the friend zone (so maybe he can learn something), or just say that she's isnt interested in anything more and save his pride.
I was a bit torn on this one. I can see why (based on some of the things she told me) that her telling him why she isnt interested in more would likely assassinate the guy's self-esteem. On the other side of the coin, I can't help but think about some of the recent posts here from male members that are confused as to why they get friend-zoned and have no idea why.
Is it better to save the person's self-esteem and leave them confused or to tell them exactly WHY they are still in the friend zone?
I found that I couldn't offer her any solid advice, as I've never found myself in that position before. Today though, thoughts of the conversation still linger.
I suppose I see now why some people just come up with some plausible excuse as to why they aren't interested in being with someone, rather than hurting them with the truth.
I don't honestly know what I'd do in her situation.
She's been on a few dates with a guy that she's known for a bit (nothing serious, just the occasional activity she explained). Apparently, the guy has made it clear that he'd like to have something "more" with her (like maybe "dating" status). She went on to tell me about some of the things that keeps her from being more than just friends with the guy. A couple of them really baffled me (I guess everyone is different) and some of them...well, I can easily see why she would keep the guy in the "friend zone."
She said that she'd mentioned a couple of her concerns to him, but he just kept on doing whatever it was that caused her concern. She said that she didn't want to get serious with someone when she knew full well that some of the stuff that bothered her would just eventually cause her to dislike the guy.
Her question to me, was whether or not she should be 100% honest with him, and tell him about the things that keep him in the friend zone (so maybe he can learn something), or just say that she's isnt interested in anything more and save his pride.
I was a bit torn on this one. I can see why (based on some of the things she told me) that her telling him why she isnt interested in more would likely assassinate the guy's self-esteem. On the other side of the coin, I can't help but think about some of the recent posts here from male members that are confused as to why they get friend-zoned and have no idea why.
Is it better to save the person's self-esteem and leave them confused or to tell them exactly WHY they are still in the friend zone?
I found that I couldn't offer her any solid advice, as I've never found myself in that position before. Today though, thoughts of the conversation still linger.
I suppose I see now why some people just come up with some plausible excuse as to why they aren't interested in being with someone, rather than hurting them with the truth.
I don't honestly know what I'd do in her situation.