SophiaGrace said:
Solitary, if you hit him and he isn't a threat to you, then you will be charged with assault.
If you believe you are in danger, and he has a knife or is trying to hit you, then you can defend yourself and will not be charged.
I've always thought that if anyone is using
threat of extreme violence or intimidation that the law's not going to have too many qualms about what happens next, providing you don't drag the guy across the pavement and curb stomp him or something if you have him incapacitated.
I mean, some guy walks up and says "Give me your stuff or I'll hurt you", then I hit him, from what he said he could have been threatening me with anything. Death, GBH, some kind of permanent maiming...with who knows what implement?
And anyway, as Skorian said, it's not like I'd necessarily wait for the law to get involved after whacking someone anyway.
Skorian said:
How can you claim the law doesn't crack down? The gang was brought to justice. You can't convict people before gathering evidence to convict.
I'm afraid I don't remember the documentary name, it was a one-off. It was just called "Mugged" or something.
The law here in the UK is kind of fuzzed up in my opinion. We obviously don't have the death penalty. On top of that, politicians seem to have this stupid view that it's easier to let criminals (often violent, career ones) out of prison really early in their sentence than it is just to
build more prisons to keep the arseholes locked up in
After all, politicians usually live in huge mansions and have bodyguards, so it's not like they feel the effect of passing legislation like that.
No joke, there's been a whole bunch of cases recently where some cold, moronic scumbag has just knifed someone to death or beat them to within an inch of their life for absolutely no reason, then got out of prison in 2-5 years.
To me, that's not right at all. I don't see how an innocent victim ending up dead or with brain damage is equal to two years of the aggressor's life.
So that's what I mean by the law not cracking down. It's not much good if those punks are back out doing it all over again in two years tops.
Plus lawyers seem to screw the system constantly. A member of my family was a cop for 30 years and basically got absolutely sick of seeing blatantly guilty people pleading "not guilty" just so an unscrupulous lawyer could make the court case as long as possible and extract a huge fee from it all, over and over again.
Edit - I'll just say, in my mind, if you go up to a random 20 year old and kick his skull in for a "laugh", you should be looking at 35 years to life imprisonment with no parole, depending on the damage you do. If you go up to someone and stab/shoot them to death for no reason, you should be either dangling from a short rope or in prison until you die.
I used to be completely against capital punishment, but I'm starting to think it'd actually be well served for some of the particularly heinous crimes that are becoming increasingly common. It takes a particular soulessness to walk into a shop and fatally smash an item into a young person's face, just because it takes your fancy.
Yes, that actually happened, I will try to dig the news item out, it was from a while back, but IIRC there was no connection between the victim and the criminal involved and the perp thought it was hilarious.
I bet if judges started handing out sentences like that, this whole crowd of 16-25 year olds who think it's really funny to **** up someone's life would suddenly start diminishing rapidly.