VanillaCreme
Well-known member
Solivagant said:A few people misuse the system, so it's disabled for everyone?
One moldy strawberry contaminates the whole container.
Solivagant said:A few people misuse the system, so it's disabled for everyone?
If they thought...epic fail. LMAO!TheRealCallie said:Maybe they just wanted to look cool.
I like this idea, as well as a 'kudos' format, where the post itself is given a thumbs up and only applicable within the thread.TheRealCallie said:Does this forum system (I don't think it does) have the option to put the thank/like system on instead of the reps?
I think this suggestion is a nice thought, too. Although, that could get quite hectic for those of us who would be messaging more than just one or two specific individuals.Mr Seal The Albatros said:Maybe until the rep system is fixed, sending a PM might work? Y'know, like a thank you letter.
kamya said:How am I going to catch up to ladyf now that it's been disabled?
Such a cruel, unfair world. T.T
TheRealCallie said:Clearly, you don't talk to the right people. It could have happened for you. I mean, as you have seen, 200 reps in a very short time is totally doable.... :club:
Solivagant said:I'm confused by this decision. =/ Does it really matter if a few people want to rep each other ten thousand times? I mean, why do we care? It's not as though it's hurting anyone, it's just an annoyance, which I was ignoring like all the other annoyances that occur around here. Were they given a warning first?
Maybe I'm missing something... I guess I just don't see why it's such a problem that it warrants disabling the system. I understand they weren't using it in the best way, but what was the actual abuse? What line was crossed? Were they enjoying themselves too much? Are there restrictions on the reasons you can give reps?
TheSkaFish said:I didn't think it mattered how often people gave each other rep points either. I just always felt that some people used them sparingly, and others used them liberally. Some people only used them for deep posts, and others used them just because they liked another member. I can understand how using them too often kind of cheapens the value of them, but everyone values rep points differently anyway. I could guess that some people were using the point system more liberally than others, but I wasn't offended by it. It's not like they are money, or that you win a prize after you get a certain number, or that you unlock some kind of rank or ability once you get so many. It's not like they were stealing something.
I wouldn't even call it an annoyance. It didn't seem like they were up to no good, just a little joke that got out of hand I guess. Some people just like to see a certain number by their names, like getting stickers or gold stars in grade school.
I get that it's not my decision to make. I just wanted to say that I for one could tell what was probably going on and didn't really care. And I also noticed a little hate going on towards the rep-crazy parties, but it just felt like they were having some innocent fun to me.
TheRealCallie said:As for IF it comes back. Does this forum system (I don't think it does) have the option to put the thank/like system on instead of the reps? Personally, I like that system better, as you can choose to thank someone for what they said or like their post instead of giving them a reputation point.
Solivagant said:^ Those were kinda my feelings on the matter too.
Dandelion said:^^ +1 rep for great post above
VanillaCreme said:It's not breaking a rule to spam rep points. Just because it's not a rule doesn't mean it wasn't misuse. It's a little bit of common sense and common decency not to spam anything in the first place.
TheSkaFish said:VanillaCreme said:It's not breaking a rule to spam rep points. Just because it's not a rule doesn't mean it wasn't misuse. It's a little bit of common sense and common decency not to spam anything in the first place.
I understand. And, I also agree that the purpose of rep points probably was obvious to most people. But without a specific rule written against it, it still is kinda open to interpretation. Like if there were no speed limits, just "don't go too fast". Is 40 mph too fast? 50? Is it too fast just here, or everywhere? Some people need specifics otherwise they don't know how to act. Not everyone is good at inferring things, particularly when social skills have not been fully developed due to loneliness. We are on a forum for lonely people, after all.
It's been my experience in life that sometimes, common sense and common decency are not so common after all!
I'm not trying to argue with you. I'm just saying, I don't think the rep-point people were out to be "bad guys".
TheSkaFish said:VanillaCreme said:It's not breaking a rule to spam rep points. Just because it's not a rule doesn't mean it wasn't misuse. It's a little bit of common sense and common decency not to spam anything in the first place.
I understand. And, I also agree that the purpose of rep points probably was obvious to most people. But without a specific rule written against it, it still is kinda open to interpretation. Like if there were no speed limits, just "don't go too fast". Is 40 mph too fast? 50? Is it too fast just here, or everywhere? Some people need specifics otherwise they don't know how to act. Not everyone is good at inferring things, particularly when social skills have not been fully developed due to loneliness. We are on a forum for lonely people, after all.
It's been my experience in life that sometimes, common sense and common decency are not so common after all!
I'm not trying to argue with you. I'm just saying, I don't think the rep-point people were out to be "bad guys".
TheRealCallie said:Seeing as the offenders think it's just hilarious, I'd say they know damn well what they were doing....
TheRealCallie said:Seeing as the offenders think it's just hilarious, I'd say they know damn well what they were doing....
Enter your email address to join: