ardour said:
The 'perpetually single loser guy' + single mother is a bad/unlikely match in my opinion. When there's zero experience to look back on the idea of being thrown in the deep end while raising another man’s kids can seem humiliating. And since kids are involved there’s going to be very little slack cut, so no room for the inevitable first-relationship mistakes and faux pas.
Personally, I don't think experience matters in the slightest. It's not about what you have had or have done or have said or whatever. It's about how you treat the woman. It's about how you treat the child. It's about how you react to situations. Kindness, trust, honesty, communication, etc are so much more important than experience.
I would give a little slack, depending on the situation, because even people with experience are going to screw up, at times, because no one is perfect.
Joturbo said:
TheRealCallie said:
kamya said:
Joturbo said:
I was a single mum/dad 5 eves a week for 12 years it's not that hard .
.Still had 3 hrs an evening to chill out....
Shh. Don't ruin the single parent super hero image! Some people NEED this. =p
If this is directed at me, some parents are busier than others. I am constantly having to drive my kids to doctor appointments/play dates, being involved with the school, working two jobs, the obligatory household duties, driving them and volunteering at school functions, not to mention the latest road trips I am taking to see my son in his competitions. Not EVERY parent has the luxury of having 3 hours every evening to "chill out." Just because ONE person says they do doesn't mean EVERY parent does.
Some parents also blow off their kids and just toss them to whoever will watch them or leave them home alone so they can go out and get drunk and **** whoever they want. Does that mean EVERY parent is like this? Probably not, no....
Yea been there done that ..got the T-shirt except for the volunteering and two jobs.My eldest son was in a football team from age five to fifteen believe you me my Dads taxi is totally knackered now and was scrapped recently.I suppose I was lucky that I lived on a quiet road where my kids could play every night on the street.But what niggles me is this being busy with kids mantra.I worked it so that I had plenty of free time after sorting the kids school runs..meals/wash up ....playing games/homework with them when younger...nappies etc...numerous sleepovers and I'm sure a good proportion of parents are similar.Also in our house mothers day involves half hour in the morning ..kids make breakfast ,give choccies/flowers to lie in mum and if we're lucky wash up at lunchtime and maybe a meal out if I'm feeling generous.So that's about three hours total out of the day...I don't get where the being busy all day part is especially with kids being on ipad s/computers etc......
Okay, so you've been there and had 3 hours of free time in the evening, yet you didn't volunteer or have two jobs.....I do, so doesn't that kind of blow that 3 hours that is apparently so easy to get?
I live in the middle of nowhere and have to drive at least 12 miles to get to any town. I drive my kids 15 miles or so to school every day (one way), so that's at least 60 miles in the car a day. Then, of course, back to that town for after school events and whatnot. Their doctors/therapists are in a different town 25 miles from the town they go to school in. The specialists my oldest sees are even farther away than that.
Anyway, mother's day. Some people (I have been one of those people) make an entire day out of it. They go out to a park or the zoo or somewhere. Maybe a movie and dinner, on top of the "breakfast, flowers, blah blah blah." So yeah, some people feel differently about it. And my kids are NOT on screens all day. They have a limit of up to two hours a day, depending on what chores they decide to do to help me out. My oldest gets more time because he has online college courses. So yeah, some parent don't dump them in front of a screen all day every day.....