Listen, I think this article makes a good deal of sense. Is it 100% spot on? No, most articles about anything usually are not.
The point I wanted to make in this is that one should not settle because they think that's the best they can do. From my own very limited relationship experience I can say that not wanting to be alone is a horrible reason to remain in a unpleasant relationship.
Might I be wrong to assume that we have certain expectations from significant others? All I want is someone, an equal, to love me as much as I love them. If this makes me sexist or full of myself then I guess I am sorry.
At any rate, look at the first disclaimer at the bottom of bloody article.
The point I wanted to make in this is that one should not settle because they think that's the best they can do. From my own very limited relationship experience I can say that not wanting to be alone is a horrible reason to remain in a unpleasant relationship.
Might I be wrong to assume that we have certain expectations from significant others? All I want is someone, an equal, to love me as much as I love them. If this makes me sexist or full of myself then I guess I am sorry.
At any rate, look at the first disclaimer at the bottom of bloody article.
You are very much correct! It does NOT make you sexist or full of yourself. You are also 100% correct (in my opinion) about not staying in a horrible relationship, just because you don't want to be alone. There is nothing wrong with anything YOU have said. As for my post, I was only disagreeing with the gentleman who wrote the article. I thought some of the stuff was off the mark. He is entitled to his opinion too. Of course, I wouldn't dismiss a person as a potential partner, just because they didnt reach over and unlock my door. 
