Batman55 said:
Despicable Me, how about you just get to the point? Pages of posts and all I can see are crumbs of your manifesto.
What do you propose... have you begun your quest yet... if not, what will it take to make you begin this Grand Quest, sir?
If you detect a semi-mocking tone here, you wouldn't be very far off. I detect arrogance here with you. Whether you've achieved things most can only dream of and believe your arrogance is "justified" and you won't suffer fools gladly, I really don't care. I have never enjoyed this particular character trait, and suspect it is the main reason you don't get along with people. Arrogance is just as great a flaw as apathy, even worse, perhaps.
You only prove my point.
I open up to the people here and what happens? I get called "arrogant". I get called "despicable" (although that is part of my username and the person was banned, but still...). Like I said, I've been called everything under the sun and I really don't care.
You think I'm arrogant? So what? I still don't care.
The questions you ask aren't even part of the topic. The topic is about what to do when the world hates you. No one has even answered the question yet.
You're asking me to open up even more, and to you, to someone who basically just insulted me? And you think I'm the one being arrogant?
There were some people here who tried to associate with what I am going through even if they couldn't answer my question, and others who tried to help even if they couldn't associate. But you're just attacking me, aren't you? What is the point of that?
Locke said:
Society isn't responsible for you undermining people. And yes, if someone sees that you're undermining them just because you think they're annoying, they may think of you as a monster.
You are twisting what I've said around to make me look like a monster, rather than trying to understand where I'm coming from. You, too, are only proving my point.
Rather than trying to understand what I mean - you make your own conclusion of which puts all of the blame on me. But am I really to blame? You don't know that - it's merely an assumption you're making.
And even if I were to blame for some of the things I do, so what? Just like Batman55 you are missing the entire point. As I've pointed out, why should I be hated for who I really am? Why does it matter if I'm to blame for some of it or not? The question still remains.
Locke said:
I would give my life in a heartbeat if it would change the world for the better. But I'm not MLK or Ghandi. So I do what I can.
Truthfully you will give your life to make the world a better place?
I don't think that is really true. You say you aren't MLK or Ghandi, but what does that even mean? Did MLK or Ghandi give their lives before they gave their lives?
If you're just to merely to state you are unable to give your life to change the world, when in fact it is exactly that very thing they did, you are merely proving that you would not give it so freely.
What is stopping you from being the next MLK or Ghandi, Locke? There is absolutely nothing stopping you except yourself.
And this is the truth that you don't wish to face.
Locke said:
If I owned a car that destroyed things as it passed, I'd stop driving it. Not because people would label me as a monster, but because I don't want to hurt anyone. Harming others because you don't care what they think is a crappy excuse.
You're taking things a little too literally. You do understand everything I've said is figurative, correct?
Locke said:
I don't hide behind a mask, I'm not oppressed. I don't need masks to hide behind. That would just be a waste of time and energy. I suppose it's because, no matter how unpopular my beliefs can be, I'm not afraid of them.
Funny. Because you just said you'd give your life "in a heartbeat" to change the world, yet I've just proven you would not do this. And you say you don't wear a mask yourself?
As for being oppressed - believe whatever you want, this doesn't mean its true.
Are you really not afraid of your beliefs? Then why not go give your life, as you say you would do, in this very heartbeat? I ask you again: What is stopping you?
Locke said:
If you're not afraid of it, why not share your beliefs? Maybe it's just the way I'm reading your posts, but you keep hinting at things, like you don't mind extreme actions, and you'd love to solve what you see as the world's problems. So in case that's what you're getting at, let me make it clear to you: If you daydream about fixing the world by murdering billions, you are a monster.
The 'monster' thing is a superficial appearance. It's a judgement people make about me when they don't know the real me, and perhaps when some people don't even know themselves or choose not to face reality. It is not the actual real me.
Obviously you can't solve the world's problems by murdering billions of people. How would those two things even go together?
But let's assume that I was a real monster, that I actually believed this. Why does it make me a monster if this horrible thing would in fact actually solve all the world's problems? Is it so wrong to question morality like this?
What if there actually were real solutions that people simply just didn't like because people just didn't like them?
What makes something 'good' and what makes something 'bad'? Can you answer that for me? It is, in a way, related to the topic question and I'd like to know the answer.
Anyway, I won't share my beliefs because I am not prepared yet. I still have some use for this forum and I'd like to think that others here still might have some use for me and the advice I can give. There is a time and a place for everything. That time is simply just not right now.
Locke said:
I have no idea if that's what you're talking about though, since you've also mentioned several men of peace in your posts. It all seems a little pointless to me, honestly.
If you read all of my posts you'd see that people like Jesus, Gandhi, and MLK were seen as monsters by many, many people in their times.
What about someone like Nelson Mandela? He was literally deemed a "terrorist" before he was deemed a Hero, before he unified the nation. And would those people who called him a "terrorist" be wrong, per se? Depends on your perspective, doesn't it? What your definitions of 'right' and 'wrong' are, and how you can unify these qualities in reality, if you can.
Locke said:
If you're oppressed, who's fault is it again? Well, no, not even fault: Who's decision is it? You're the one who's not being very open here.
Because you do not even realize your own oppression, I can't explain this to you. You'll merely have to take my word for it that it is not any of our faults, it is not our decision.
Locke said:
This entire thread summed up:
"I'm a monster. People misunderstand me!"
"Huh? Why?"
"I can't tell you because you'll think I'm a monster!"
I like how you conveniently ignore the entire topic post, summing up the entire topic as only resembling the title, and don't even bother to address the main point.
Don't you think that is a little... you know... naive? Do me a favor and actually read the main post. There is a main point to the topic, a question even, that I have not yet been given any answer.
Locke said:
Do you see how frustrating that is? If anyone misunderstands you, maybe it's because you keep going on about Pokémon and Jesus, instead of telling us.
It's even more frustrating when people:
1. Misunderstand you.
2. Insult you.
3. Jump to conclusions.
4. Ignore the main point and all questions.
5. Etc.
Don't you think?
If I felt it was necessary to elaborate on the details to have my question answered I either would not have created the topic or I would have given those details. I'm not stupid. I have given more than enough information for someone to answer my questions.
And in a very odd way, I think that question actually has been answered. Minus a few people who seem to agree with me, I have gotten mostly the same responses here as I have anywhere else, even when I am less vague. This confirms my prior conclusions.
Locke said:
It's your choice. Again, it's pretty simple: If you want to hurt people, then people will see as a bad guy.
Let me give you an example here where this 'rule' falls apart:
If a man takes over an entire nation, starts gassing millions of people in a genocidal rampage, and the only way to stop him is by starting a war and hurting a lot of people - Are you the "bad guy" or the "good guy" or something else?
Your 'rule' seems to fall apart in reality. Sometimes it is necessary to hurt people - sometimes many people - to help others.
The "choices" here only being who you help, and when and where you help them.
Locke said:
How? By asking them if they want to be Martin Luther King? My 5th grade philosophy teacher did the same thing. The math teacher was the real monster though.
Your "answers" you provided don't seem to work in reality.
It seems you assume there are 'black and white' areas of morality yourself, so the questions I've posed to you should give you some pause. If you honestly ask yourself these questions, and face reality, I think you'll find that some of your moral guidelines are themselves questionable.
So you want to know how? I've provided several examples, and the questions I pose to people only get harder and harder as the conversation continues.
Locke said:
I tease because I'm not a big fan of evasiveness. Sorry.
I don't mind teasing. It's the unnecessary assumptions (and insults) that I don't like.
If you have a question about something I said, just ask. Obviously I've already explained I won't be stating my exact beliefs, for a few reasons, but anything other than that is free to ask. I can still use plenty of analogies for the things I can't answer.
Locke said:
You are the one who is judging other people by not giving them the opportunity to see the "real" you".
You don't think I've tried?
I'm not judging anyone here - I'm just being safe for now.
What would be the point in opening up to people I don't really know at all, only to have a most of them either dismiss me or attack me simply because of their prejudices?
I've only used metaphors so far and look at what has already happened. One person was banned, another insulted me, and you think I might be a genocidal maniac or something (although that is probably partially my fault for the vagueness).
Jeez. You don't even want to know what it's like when I actually open up.
That's my problem. The more I open up the more destructive everyone around me becomes.
As I said before, people simply just do not want change. If you talk about change, real change, they freak out. They go crazy. They treat you like a monster.
You talked about Breaking Bad in the opening of your post. You say he was a monster because of his choices, but what choices did he really have to make? Wasn't he just doing what he could to stay alive? Didn't he stop at one point?
And was he really the monster of that story? I don't want to give any spoilers for people who might not have seen it all, but you see real monsters unfolding through the story. There are people in the series that make Walter look like an angel compared to them.
And the end to it all... Do you realize what he did in the end? Because of his final acts the world became a better place.
So, really, tell me: Was he really a monster? What was he, exactly? I want to know.
Originally I meant this topic mostly just as a question as to how to find other people like myself, but I think now I'm more interested to know why people like myself are so hard to find.
Locke said:
Don't "+1" people who are insulting, even if you don't quote the most insulting part of the post. It only makes you just as guilty.