There are several things going on here, in order to try and keep things simple I will handle them separately.
1. The message in a bottle
This is about the intent of my post. It was never my intention to 'wow you with my intellect', to declare myself superior or anything of the sort. I'm not looking for advice or analysis of the specific words I used. I don't need you to dissect my problem and point out the mistakes in my reasoning (as there aren't any! just kidding
). My post was intended as a beacon, a message in a bottle for others like myself to stumble upon one day. They would definitely not be offended by me saying I'm exceptionally smart, as it's one of the keywords that needs to be in the message in order to maximize the chances of said people actually reading it. For instance, I've googled the phrase 'gifted but lonely'. I imagine if there is someone out there like me, they could very well do the same. If I don't mention 'gifted' in my post, how would they ever find it (and me)?
2. Conclusions drawn about my mental state and character
It seems not only was the intent of my post misunderstood, but several wrong conclusions were drawn from it concerning who I am and how I treat people. Don't you think one post (and not even an offensive one!) is too small a sample size to categorize someone as 'arrogant' or as anything, really? I get called out for being rigid and for my supposed lack of open-mindedness but you have me all figured out from this one paragraph I wrote?
I'm completely harmless and innocent, like a child really. I have never in my life purposefully hurt someone. When you jump to conclusions like this and sling derogatory adjectives my way, it hurts me and depresses me. Which is fine, I have both anticipated and accepted this as a possible (and likely) consequence of my decision to post the story. But I say it so you know. The only one of the adjectives that actually fits me is 'misunderstood'.
3. Socrates
The Socratic mantra of "The only thing I know is that I know nothing" has actually been really prominent in my life. It was one of the ways in which I learned that I was smarter than other people (from a very young age), in the sense that people were always claiming things to be absolutely true and I knew they could never know this for sure. I have however since pretty much abandoned using this principle in everyday life since I found to be quite impractical. I'll try to explain: If I fall down the stairs, I will get hurt. Of course I don't know this for sure, and there's a chance I won't get hurt. But when it comes to decision-making, it saves time just to add the consequence 'I will get hurt' to the action 'falling down the stairs' because that's what's most likely to happen. This system of probability is one I use in all my decisions. I will think about all of the possible options and then decide on the course that I believe has the best chance of a good outcome.
Now, when it comes to my world view, there has been a similar evolution. I used to be completely open-minded, and if you dig deep enough, I still am. It's just that my theories have been proven right enough times that I can safely say they are universally true, in the sense that they are very likely to be (same principle as my example above). Does that mean that I am rigid? Absolutely not. If you present an alternate theory, or a rational argument disproving mine, I will always listen. If I think you have a point, I have no problem whatsoever with a modifying my theory or even abandoning it. This just doesn't happen very often. Keep in mind, I've spent half my lifetime on something most people just don't have time for, if you have an argument that isn't completely original chances are that I've read about it, heard about it, and tried to understand it several times already. If it was a good one (like the Socrates thing) it already has a place within my way of thinking.
4. Superman
If you haven't seen the movie The Iron Giant, I can't recommend it highly enough. It's the origin of my nickname, and what this means has also been misunderstood. Basically it comes down to this: Being Superman is choosing to do the right thing, transcending your nature or original purpose, to become something better than yourself. When you think about it in this sense, the world can't have enough Supermen, right? People that each day aspire to be someone better than they were yesterday? I'm no hero, but I could be one day. All that matters is how you see yourself. If this form of confidence in myself is again mistaken for arrogance, so be it!
Phew! I think I'm going to leave it at that for now. Again, thanks for the feedback.