running with pain
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
- Messages
- 669
- Reaction score
- 0
i learned that i forgot a lot in chemistry over the past school year :rolleyes2:
perfanoff said:The problem would be the detector efficiency, I gather it would be abysmal and you would have to use incredible power inputs to create a reliably detectable signal.
I'm not up-to-date with neutrino detector efficiency, but if 99.999% pass through the entire Earth without an interaction, then you add up the terrestrial and extraterrestrial noise (there can be no insulation here).. it's a very far shot to think it's plausible at that moment.
But yeah, signal delay would be as small as the delay from a fiber optics cable going straight through the earth. Meaning you'll get a roughly 37% decrease in the latency than from conventional round-the-world means.
9006 said:perfanoff said:The problem would be the detector efficiency, I gather it would be abysmal and you would have to use incredible power inputs to create a reliably detectable signal.
I'm not up-to-date with neutrino detector efficiency, but if 99.999% pass through the entire Earth without an interaction, then you add up the terrestrial and extraterrestrial noise (there can be no insulation here).. it's a very far shot to think it's plausible at that moment.
But yeah, signal delay would be as small as the delay from a fiber optics cable going straight through the earth. Meaning you'll get a roughly 37% decrease in the latency than from conventional round-the-world means.
Yes I was going to point out the delay between the detectors, I don't think there would be many (if any) advantages for doing this, I think it would just be a proof of concept project, costing millions in tax.
I think fiber optics is the choice for the modern family.
perfanoff said:9006 said:perfanoff said:The problem would be the detector efficiency, I gather it would be abysmal and you would have to use incredible power inputs to create a reliably detectable signal.
I'm not up-to-date with neutrino detector efficiency, but if 99.999% pass through the entire Earth without an interaction, then you add up the terrestrial and extraterrestrial noise (there can be no insulation here).. it's a very far shot to think it's plausible at that moment.
But yeah, signal delay would be as small as the delay from a fiber optics cable going straight through the earth. Meaning you'll get a roughly 37% decrease in the latency than from conventional round-the-world means.
Yes I was going to point out the delay between the detectors, I don't think there would be many (if any) advantages for doing this, I think it would just be a proof of concept project, costing millions in tax.
I think fiber optics is the choice for the modern family.
Yeah pretty much.
Anyway, research is what drives this world, so let them spend their millions.
Don't forget how the transistor came
flaneur said:I was told to get this abnormal amount of fluid around my gall bladder checked out, but I prefer blissful ignorance and can't stand waiting rooms. It can't be too serious, right? Right?! Le sigh.
perfanoff said:That Schrodinger's first name is Erwin
9006 said:perfanoff said:That Schrodinger's first name is Erwin
Only just???
perfanoff said:I learned again that Eminem's old stuff is awesome.
perfanoff said:I learned again that Eminem's old stuff is awesome.
9006 said:perfanoff said:I learned again that Eminem's old stuff is awesome.
You mean his evaluations on patent applications?
Enter your email address to join: