TheLoadedDog said:I think the mention of rapists is a whole different matter. Any psychologist wil tell you that rape is not about sex. No man has such an overpowering need to orgasm that he will do that. It's about POWER. They have chemically castrated rapists, and they still go on to attack women. Often they do it even more, because they are now emasculated and angry.
TheRealCallie said:I could have sex if I wanted to, yes. I've had offers, I just don't feel sex should be had if there isn't something more there. Blame it on religion, blame it on some kind of label, I don't care, it's just how I feel about the topic.
Sex is not something you NEED to survive. It is nothing like eating or sleeping or breathing. You NEED those to live, you don't NEED sex to live.
TheLoadedDog said:They try to rip one another's clothing off, because nakedness in public would be the ultimate humiliation.
DarkSelene said:Maybe it's not needed for survival, but to feel wanted is needed for one's mental well-being, at least once to feel worthy of a connection like that. Especially when it seems like people of all shapes and sizes have the chance to experience it, except you.
DarkSelene said:You choose to not have sex if not in a committed relationship, one doesn't choose to be a virgin forever (unless religious, etc). It's forced upon them for not being desirable enough, by society's standards!
Maybe it's not needed for survival, but to feel wanted is needed for one's mental well-being, at least once to feel worthy of a connection like that. Especially when it seems like people of all shapes and sizes have the chance to experience it, except you.
Paraiyar said:TheLoadedDog said:I think the mention of rapists is a whole different matter. Any psychologist wil tell you that rape is not about sex. No man has such an overpowering need to orgasm that he will do that. It's about POWER. They have chemically castrated rapists, and they still go on to attack women. Often they do it even more, because they are now emasculated and angry.
That's a common ideological slogan but it's not one supported by evidence or at least the the evidence shows a more complex reality:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...e-is-not-only-about-power-it-s-also-about-sex
TheRealCallie said:Yes, I CHOOSE to not have sex, I never said otherwise. However, to say that some are FORCED to not have sex by an outside force is kind of bullshit. Society isn't stopping them, THEY are stopping them. It's not society that is making them undesirable. In a lot of cases, it's their attitude (whether that is fear or just negativity) or their own outrageous standards that stops them. Unless society is tying them up and holding them captive, it's not forcing them to remain virgins.
Take X and Ska for example. They are both good looking guys, so it's not looks that are stopping them. I can't speak for X because I don't know the cultural differences where he lives, but Ska could probably easily get a one night stand if he wanted to. X could too, if he was in America (not sure about how that works where he is). Para is a good looking guy too. Most of the guys here are better looking than they think they are. Obviously, I can't comment on those that haven't posted their pics.
So yeah, nothing is FORCING them, except themselves. Maybe they don't want a one night stand, maybe fear is stopping them, maybe their standards are just too **** high, but no, it's not some stupid ass imaginary rules that are forcing someone into something they don't want. That's a pretty lame excuse, IMO.
I never said sex wasn't important for those who want to have sex, I just said it's not VITAL. Taking on the victim mentality and the "whoa is me, everyone but me" isn't going to help anyone. Coddling them isn't going to help them. Quite simply, NOTHING will help them until they want help. Sure, they can say they do want help, but a lot of times they aren't willing to do the work. They want a quick fix (hence going to prostitutes). They want to hear what they want to hear and fresia anyone who dares try to tell them differently.
Richard_39 said:On an unrelated topic, but related to the questions for men, although it's kind of heavy a subject, still, it's something that tortures me sometimes.
I feel guilty for not killing him. Like...I don't know..."less of a man"? No, I don't think that's quite right. Besides which, my supposed virility or not is the last thing I ever wondered about in my life. But in a sense...I sometimes feel like I'm making a mistake. Like I should decide "screw it, I'll do the time, at least it's for the right reasons".
Is that...wrong? (Of course its wrong, end result will land me 25+ years) but is it morally wrong? I always viewed a big difference between law and justice.
Letting an abuser like that walk...it feels wrong. I have trouble with it. Not necessarily anger or revenge type of trouble. Trouble with the concept.
Also...do you believe in the trend of treating these people, because they are sick, not criminals? Or are we wasting our times and letting criminals walk "free" (they aren't free, but they're not behind bars)?
DarkSelene said:TheRealCallie said:Yes, I CHOOSE to not have sex, I never said otherwise. However, to say that some are FORCED to not have sex by an outside force is kind of bullshit. Society isn't stopping them, THEY are stopping them. It's not society that is making them undesirable. In a lot of cases, it's their attitude (whether that is fear or just negativity) or their own outrageous standards that stops them. Unless society is tying them up and holding them captive, it's not forcing them to remain virgins.
Take X and Ska for example. They are both good looking guys, so it's not looks that are stopping them. I can't speak for X because I don't know the cultural differences where he lives, but Ska could probably easily get a one night stand if he wanted to. X could too, if he was in America (not sure about how that works where he is). Para is a good looking guy too. Most of the guys here are better looking than they think they are. Obviously, I can't comment on those that haven't posted their pics.
So yeah, nothing is FORCING them, except themselves. Maybe they don't want a one night stand, maybe fear is stopping them, maybe their standards are just too **** high, but no, it's not some stupid ass imaginary rules that are forcing someone into something they don't want. That's a pretty lame excuse, IMO.
I never said sex wasn't important for those who want to have sex, I just said it's not VITAL. Taking on the victim mentality and the "whoa is me, everyone but me" isn't going to help anyone. Coddling them isn't going to help them. Quite simply, NOTHING will help them until they want help. Sure, they can say they do want help, but a lot of times they aren't willing to do the work. They want a quick fix (hence going to prostitutes). They want to hear what they want to hear and fresia anyone who dares try to tell them differently.
Society dictates what is desirable.
I understood what you said about it not being vital the first time.
It's not to pity or coddle. My point is that when you look around and see people of all shapes and sizes, all kinds of personalities, having sex and getting in relationships as if it's the most normal thing to do (which it is) - it's difficult to not feel like there's something peculiar about yourself that's holding you back and as the years go by also very difficult to not feel inadequate, angry, depressed about this when it looks so easy to everyone else.
Let's say they don't want something casual, like a one night stand, what is the work then? It's not surface level then, they can't just be pretty, would have to offer something else. What would that be?
Richard_39 said:Paraiyar said:TheLoadedDog said:I think the mention of rapists is a whole different matter. Any psychologist wil tell you that rape is not about sex. No man has such an overpowering need to orgasm that he will do that. It's about POWER. They have chemically castrated rapists, and they still go on to attack women. Often they do it even more, because they are now emasculated and angry.
That's a common ideological slogan but it's not one supported by evidence or at least the the evidence shows a more complex reality:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...e-is-not-only-about-power-it-s-also-about-sex
Interesting article indeed. Sadly, not one I actually needed to read; I'm living it.
I've had long conversations with both my ex and my daughters, "adult" conversations (I hate to be having these about such a hard subject as this after all that's happened, I'm very strong on the thought kids should remain kids as long as humanly possible, but the die is cast, I don't have a choice anymore) who are looking for an explication, or a reason, as to why their trust in someone was betrayed after so long, but the ugly, glaring truth there is behind it is that there more likely isn't a clear cut reason. I'm sure power plays a part, but it's looking like the reason are sicker and much more idiotic as to deciding to rape children. You know, everything to help me sleep soundly at night...
On an unrelated topic, but related to the questions for men, although it's kind of heavy a subject, still, it's something that tortures me sometimes.
I feel guilty for not killing him. Like...I don't know..."less of a man"? No, I don't think that's quite right. Besides which, my supposed virility or not is the last thing I ever wondered about in my life. But in a sense...I sometimes feel like I'm making a mistake. Like I should decide "screw it, I'll do the time, at least it's for the right reasons".
Is that...wrong? (Of course its wrong, end result will land me 25+ years) but is it morally wrong? I always viewed a big difference between law and justice.
Letting an abuser like that walk...it feels wrong. I have trouble with it. Not necessarily anger or revenge type of trouble. Trouble with the concept.
Also...do you believe in the trend of treating these people, because they are sick, not criminals? Or are we wasting our times and letting criminals walk "free" (they aren't free, but they're not behind bars)?
Rodent said:Agree with Selene. Even if it would seem like inflicting righteous justice to an awful human being, you would also inevitably ruin your own life and conscience. And that would just be putting more energy into making the earth a worse place instead of a better one. What's done is done. Find purpose in something else than just sacrificing yourself for that cause.
TheLoadedDog said:It kinda of reminds me of a saying they have in Latin America:
"A 'madman' never cuts off his own balls."
Rodent said:
Society is made of...people? Individuals? Each one is adding their individual™ desires to the pile...but where do they get those?
Enter your email address to join: