V
VanillaCreme
Guest
Robin said:Steel said:It is a difficult decision. In this case, I believe that the thread in question would have just spawned another one (in some ways it did this one, although I accept this thread is nothing like the other one).
Seems a little lazy to be honest. If another thread starts, You could lock that one too. Another one, lock lock lock. I'm not sure how the topic looked like from everyone's point of view since i was a big part of it, but every discussion has a limit. The only way to make people in a heated discussion listen is to force them to, and for example like Sanal said, take it in PMs. I'm not saying You did anything wrong, but Sanal seemed to be pointing out that what was going on, by actively trying to get someone to lock that thread. As an admin, of any community, everything bad that happens is ultimate gonna be blamed on You if it's not taken care of swiftly. Yesterday was just yet another example of inactivity from the people who should be the most active. What the banned member did was a total holocaust, and i thank god for Nal's sister pulling the plug. But, it could have been done much, much sooner.
You can't force people to listen. What the hell don't you understand about that? Geezoo willickers.... Forcing isn't fair or right either. You can't force people to listen or to be active. It's not up to you. It's up to them.