Signs you got over text someone wasnt interested in you.

[insecure]

I like the way he thinks, probably one of his 'google facts', that everyone is just talking to themselves. I'm bored of him now, remember the ' Hitler guy'? now he was a bloody barrel of laughs compared to this one.

I've only been here a couple of months, was he here already then?

 

[user 135671]

I've only been here a couple of months, was he here already then?

Ah, it was probably before your time then.

 

[Diogenes]

I thought you were capable of logical thinking?
Apparently not.
If the only mistake you have been able to find in my messages was the spelling of the word misogyny, then it means my English is excellent, which is confirmed by all language tests I took.
But if you criticise anyone for making mistakes in another language then you should compare it to your own knowledge of foreign languages, which doesn't seem to amount to much.


True, but if you make a bold claim with nothing to back it up, it makes those claims unbelievable.
The same goes for me, I don't have to prove my facts either.
So what you say is just plain misogyny.
And you disguise your frustrated feelings as facts.


Why would I have to do your work?
You come up with a bold claim, with nothing to back it up.


You are simply obnoxious.
No wonder you have social problems.

Evidently you need things spelled out for you, like a child. You chose to label my statements misogyny without even being able to spell the word correctly. This indicates general ignorance. I have noticed many other errors in your posts, but I'm not obliged or interested to educate you. By your own admission, your language skills are pathetic; you only learned those that did nor require hard work.

It isn't language that matters so much in your case, as putting feelings above logic.
My assertions make you feel uncomfortable, but instead of providing any factual refutation, you demand proof from me. I have no need to attempt to teach a pig to sing.

The fact that I don't choose to quibble with the snide and ignorant isn't evidence that I cannot provide evidence.

I don't have a problem if you find the facts unbelievable. The evidence shows you don't value facts, only feelings. My assertions are self evident. The proof is ubiquitous.

Can you post a quote of me saying that I have social problems? You cannot. That is merely an emotional assumption on your part.

 

[Diogenes]

Ah, it was probably before your time then.

I'm sorry to hear that you're incapable of telling time. Maybe later when you grow up.

 

[insecure]

Evidently you need things spelled out for you, like a child. You chose to label my statements misogyny without even being able to spell the word correctly. This indicates general ignorance.

What it means is that you are nitpicking, you're the childish one, as if the spelling of a word means anything about the understanding of what it means.

I have noticed many other errors in your posts, but I'm not obliged or interested to educate you.

Just like your supposed knowledge of women, I doubt very much I could learn anything from you.
And just like those other 'facts' you have nothing to back it up.

By your own admission, your language skills are pathetic; you only learned those that did nor require hard work.

You are totally incapable of interpreting simple text.
No wonder you have social problems, and come up with these ludicrous 'facts' about women.
My language skills are excellent, according to all the experts.
I could care less about what some ***** on a forum says about them.

It isn't language that matters so much in your case, as putting feelings above logic.

Anyone knows that feelings are important.
This site is about loneliness.
Is loneliness a feeling or is it logic?
There you have your answer.

I have no need to attempt to teach a pig to sing.

Neither have I, as I suppose you squeal terribly, but I am sure your own 'research' will come up with other 'facts'.

Can you post a quote of me saying that I have social problems?

The fact that you are on a site about loneliness should be enough.
Especially for someone who claims to put logic above feelings.

 

[user 135671]

I'm sorry to hear that you're incapable of telling time. Maybe later when you grow up.

If I'm lucky I'll grow up to be as well rounded, intelligent and articulate as you.

Have a grand night wee man

 

[Diogenes]

If I'm lucky I'll grow up to be as well rounded, intelligent and articulate as you.

Have a grand night wee man

I'm sorry to hear that you're stunted and stagnant.

 

[VanillaCreme]

I'm sorry to hear that you're incapable of telling time. Maybe later when you grow up.

Are you okay? You seem more interested in throwing insults to people than actually talking to anyone. I'm not sure if you want to Google this for some research, but you don't always have to agree with people to be civil. It's okay to have a differing of ideas.

 

[user 135671]

Neither have I, as I suppose you squeal terribly,

This made me laugh so much I nearly cried

 

[user 135671]

I'm sorry to hear that you're stunted and stagnant.

I'm sorry that you seem incapable of interpreting text, perhaps google can help you. Do you have google on your plain of reality?

 

[Diogenes]

What it means is that you are nitpicking, you're the childish one, as if the spelling of a word means anything about the understanding of what it means.


Just like your supposed knowledge of women, I doubt very much I could learn anything from you.
And just like those other 'facts' you have nothing to back it up.


You are totally incapable of interpreting simple text.
No wonder you have social problems, and come up with these ludicrous 'facts' about women.
My language skills are excellent, according to all the experts.
I could care less about what some ***** on a forum says about them.


Anyone knows that feelings are important.
This site is about loneliness.
Is loneliness a feeling or is it logic?
There you have your answer.


Neither have I, as I suppose you squeal terribly, but I am sure your own 'research' will come up with other 'facts'.


The fact that you are on a site about loneliness should be enough.
Especially for someone who claims to put logic above feelings.

Ah, again, you miss subtleties, likely due to a poor grasp of English.
Sarcastically saying "Does google not function in your universe?" was not a claim that a mere word search would provide a complete answer, as you interpreted the comment. It was saying, "Do your own research".

I raised the point about your misspelling as one example of ignorance. You know nothing of me, you only have an emotional reaction to go by, and it's inaccurate.

I agree, it's unlikely you could learn anything from me, because your feelings block your ability to think.

The fact that I refuse to get drawn into a quibbling match does not mean I have nothing to back it up. Again, why should I care that you are not convinced?

Can you cut and paste a quote of me stating that feelings are not important? No, you cannot, because I never said that. What I did say is that feelings are not tools to perceive objective reality.

If you don't care about my observations regarding your English language skills, why are you so hysterically defensive?

You jump to a lot of conclusions, make a lot of assumptions.
You have no idea why I am here.

 

[Diogenes]

This made me laugh so much I nearly cried

I'm sorry to hear that you're so shallow and snide.

 

[user 135671]

I'm sorry to hear that you're so shallow and snide.

I've been called worse by far better. This is just a suggestion man, if you're going to come on a forum and be an arsehole at least do it with some panache.

 

[Diogenes]

Are you okay? You seem more interested in throwing insults to people than actually talking to anyone. I'm not sure if you want to Google this for some research, but you don't always have to agree with people to be civil. It's okay to have a differing of ideas.

Are you okay? You seem more interested in a hasty judgement of my self defense than in carefully reading, which would lead you to discover the snide attack that sparked all this.

I am fine with differing ideas. I was challenged "prove it" and declined. Insults towards me ensued. If they disagree, the onus is upon them to disprove the facts I asserted. That is all I've been saying.

 

[Diogenes]

I've been called worse by far better. This is just a suggestion man, if you're going to come on a forum and be an arsehole at least do it with some panache.

I'm sorry your lack of panahce makes you behave like an arsehole.

 

[insecure]

Ah, again, you miss subtleties, likely due to a poor grasp of English.
Sarcastically saying "Does google not function in your universe?" was not a claim that a mere word search would provide a complete answer, as you interpreted the comment. It was saying, "Do your own research".

Even jumping through a dozen hoops, it remains stupid what you said.
You didn't do any research, you just pretend you did.

I raised the point about your misspelling as one example of ignorance. You know nothing of me, you only have an emotional reaction to go by, and it's inaccurate.

I've seen enough people like you, who claim to have done 'research', but just did a couple of google searches, and believed the results that they liked, and ignored the rest.
Making a spelling mistake does not make one ignorant, meanwhile I spotted some spelling mistakes in other messages in this thread.
Apparently you didn't...
Your logic is completely flawed.
No wonder you always come up with those crazy conclusions.

I agree, it's unlikely you could learn anything from me, because your feelings block your ability to think.

On the contrary, it is the fact that I do use logic that makes it impossible to learn from your mumbo jumbo.

The fact that I refuse to get drawn into a quibbling match does not mean I have nothing to back it up. Again, why should I care that you are not convinced?

I am sorry to hear that you have nothing to back up your ridiculous claims.
If you don't care, why do you keep replying with those ridiculous "I am sorry that..." phrases?
Maybe they should have a bot check on this site, I doubt you would pass it.

Can you cut and paste a quote of me stating that feelings are not important? No, you cannot, because I never said that. What I did say is that feelings are not tools to perceive objective reality.

Yet you want to pretend you are only thinking in a logical way, completely free from feelings.
The 'objective reality' is something human beings will probably never be able to grasp completely.

If you don't care about my observations regarding your English language skills, why are you so hysterically defensive?

I'm sorry you don't know the meaning of the word 'hysterically'.
Nitwits like you can't judge me.

You have no idea why I am here.

You are here because you have social issues.
This whole thread is ample proof of this.

 

[VanillaCreme]

Are you okay? You seem more interested in a hasty judgement of my self defense than in carefully reading, which would lead you to discover the snide attack that sparked all this.

I am fine with differing ideas. I was challenged "prove it" and declined. Insults towards me ensued. If they disagree, the onus is upon them to disprove the facts I asserted. That is all I've been saying.

Not only do you keep it going, but you honestly started the whole back and forth by posting obnoxious views on genders. Sorry, but people are going to point out silly generalizations. If you don't want people to point out those generalizations, then you shouldn't post them. You can't honestly think that no one was going to point out anything you said in that post.

 

[Diogenes]

Even jumping through a dozen hoops, it remains stupid what you said.
You didn't do any research, you just pretend you did.


I've seen enough people like you, who claim to have done 'research', but just did a couple of google searches, and believed the results that they liked, and ignored the rest.
Making a spelling mistake does not make one ignorant, meanwhile I spotted some spelling mistakes in other messages in this thread.
Apparently you didn't...
Your logic is completely flawed.
No wonder you always come up with those crazy conclusions.

On the contrary, it is the fact that I do use logic that makes it impossible to learn from your mumbo jumbo.


I am sorry to hear that you have nothing to back up your ridiculous claims.
If you don't care, why do you keep replying with those ridiculous "I am sorry that..." phrases?
Maybe they should have a bot check on this site, I doubt you would pass it.


Yet you want to pretend you are only thinking in a logical way, completely free from feelings.
The 'objective reality' is something human beings will probably never be able to grasp completely.


I'm sorry you don't know the meaning of the word 'hysterically'.
Nitwits like you can't judge me.


You are here because you have social issues.
This whole thread is ample proof of this.

Your errors are piling up almost too quickly to refute.
Your assessment of me is erroneous and insignificant.

You disliked hearing the truth, but were too lazy to attempt to refute the facts.
You merely got emotionally upset and petulantly chimed in with the snide troll who said. in effect, "Prove it".

If you're content in your ignorance, I have no problem with that. In fact, the attacks against me here provide evidence of the caliber of person who can't handle the truth.

Again, evidence that you have a poor grasp of the English language. Evidence is not synonymous with proof.

Show this thread to your quack therapist. You're projecting.

I'm confident and secure in the factual nature of my assertions. No matter what evidence I showed you, you'd quibble in defense of a preconceived position based upon emotion. It makes you feel uncomfortable to hear the bitter reality about women, and you desperately want a woman. Your very handle says it. Insecure.

 

[insecure]

Your errors are piling up almost too quickly to refute.
Your assessment of me is erroneous and insignificant.

Your responses are not above the childish level of "takes one to know one".
You're boring and you lack content.
And as always your claims are based on nothing.

You disliked hearing the truth, but were too lazy to attempt to refute the facts.

You can't speak of "the truth", "facts" if you are unable to prove them.
In that case they are just your opinion, nothing more, nothing less.
Insisting on posting your opinion as facts, makes you obnoxious, especially if you accompany them with insults.

If you're content in your ignorance, I have no problem with that. In fact, the attacks against me here provide evidence of the caliber of person who can't handle the truth.

Which is what any deluded person would say.
Anyone who doesn't accept your crazy ideas (sorry "facts"), must be unable to handle the truth...

Again, evidence that you have a poor grasp of the English language. Evidence is not synonymous with proof.

Don't worry, you have given neither.
Nothing wrong with my English, maybe start googling a bit.

Show this thread to your quack therapist. You're projecting.

You're such an *****.

It makes you feel uncomfortable to hear the bitter reality about women, and you desperately want a woman. Your very handle says it. Insecure.

Anyone who read my posts from the beginning would know better.
But hey, those people are better at their mother tongue (English, for those that are bad at interpreting simple text...).
Sorry to see that you suck at it.

 

[Diogenes]

Not only do you keep it going, but you honestly started the whole back and forth by posting obnoxious views on genders. Sorry, but people are going to point out silly generalizations. If you don't want people to point out those generalizations, then you shouldn't post them. You can't honestly think that no one was going to point out anything you said in that post.

Well, the obvious question is, why do you care?
What do you hope to achieve?

You completely disqualify yourself as a judge by exposing your bias toward the initial post. The facts don't care about your feelings.

By your logic, I'm entitled to snidely insult and harass anyone if I find their initial post "obnoxious" and they are not entitled to fight back.

Can you cut and paste a quote of me saying that I did not want anyone to point anything out? You cannot, because I did not. My objection is that their "points" are irrational, dishonest, just lame Ad Hominem attacks.

Even if confirmation bias is taken into account, what you label generalizations are not mere opinion. Stereotypes emerge from real life facts. The PC police can attempt to shout them down as "not nice" but facts are facts. Are there exceptions. Sure. So what? They don't disprove the bulk of the evidence.