That technology was supposed to have made our lives better, but seems to have made them worse instead by making most people redundant, or on their way to it.
I question the point of improving technology, if it's just going to put us all out of work, while society still demands that we work to justify and re-justify our existence over and over again, day in and day out, for the rest of our lives. Seeing new technology and what it can do, but living in the same old world with the same old capitalism, makes tech a lot less impressive for me, because I don't feel like it's really going to improve anything, and if it's not going to improve anything then what is there really to get interested in and excited about it? Just more novelty toys for people who already won the game to play with, while the rest of us fall further and further behind where we used to be. It's like the people in charge don't understand that having a strong, robust middle class - not billionaires - was what made modern countries functional and healthy in the first place.
You could say that the only reason the middle class existed at all, was due to inefficiencies in technology - we still just needed more people doing the work that machines now do. Then technology got better, and we needed less humans working than we did before. But the problem is, having that middle class, due to still needing people to do the jobs that machines couldn't do yet, was what gave more people a higher quality of life than before, and that's what made this country work. Without that, what's all of this for? So a few people can get stupid rich and the rest of us can not only get nowhere, but do even worse than we were doing before? Why should the rest of us work for that?
If technology will make it so that most people are no longer NEEDED to work to produce things, but therefore can't make money, and we still demand that people make money to justify their continued existence, then maybe we should hit the brakes on technology to preserve people being needed to work to produce things. But halting and reversing human progress doesn't seem like much of an answer.
Which brings me to another thing that drives me crazy - I don't think the purpose of life is to be economically productive. I think that the purpose of life should be up to the individual to decide for themselves what their own purpose of life will be, as long as it doesn't harm anyone. And I think modern technology should have set us free to do this. Life had to be about production in the past, when resources were scarce, the science and technology to produce a surplus just wasn't there yet, and people's thinking and worldview was more violent and competitive, and less compassionate and understanding. But just because things WERE that way, doesn't mean they still need to be that way, or should be that way forever because "it's just the way it is/it's just human nature". We used to stone people as witches too, it doesn't mean that we still should, or that we ever should have back then either.
I don't think there is one singular "human nature", and I think that's part of what it means to be sentient - we don't have to operate on base instinct alone, we can choose something higher that might make no sense in the context of survival of the fittest, but it's just nicer, more civilized, and it makes life happier as a result. We can all choose our individual nature for ourselves - again, as long as it doesn't harm anyone.
It's like I was thinking, the world is getting too small for war, and technology is getting too efficient for capitalism. It's like we're trying to run a really old operating system on a new computer. Or like trying to keep eating food that's long since expired and gone hard and stale, and there's no nutritional value in it anymore. Continuing to do things in ways that we should have long outgrown, is what I feel is causing all this dysfunction, in spite of technology getting better. We need to evolve beyond competition to something else more compatible with the new world, and we need to do it yesterday.