When watching **** becomes just sad...it's time to kill your sex drive.

[Badjedidude]

In that case can I call you Big Daddy and hop on (if there's any
room)
Oh marvellous.

Ahh the 'manly' thing would explain why so few men can carry them
off. They are rather underrated, I believe; quite sexy, if anything.

*nods vehemently* Yes! You've got it!

And yes you may. lol

....but NEVER have I ridden a mustache. Maybe that needs to go on the ole, "Bucket List"

Well, damn! I may need to start a client-list for this!

Highest bidder gets firsties!

P.S. ALL does not in any way condone or promote prostitution. Especially not across state lines. Leave me alone, FBI. Thanks.

 

[edgecrusher]

i dont now that its sad, but i worry that sex will lose its meaning for me. or the meaning of it will get warped due to what internet **** is. so if/when it finally happens im worried that it will have lost its meaning or i will have some warped perception of it and be stupid and/or akward about it.

 

[eris]

I am really not directing what I am about to say to ANYONE on this forum. In fact, it is directed at some guy on another forum. Why am I posting it here ? eh, I think it may help.

I know a 25 year old "average" guy. He is average in many ways, and many people would say he is below avarage when it comes to looks.

he has never been out on a date with a girl.

Why ?

They are too ugly.

He was raised on Playboy. He was raised on internet ****.

Average girls are not GOOD ENOUGH for him. He even picks apart people that have "model" good looks.

There are a lot of guys ( and some girls I am sure ) that are like this.

They want what they see on the ****o, and, sorry dude, its probably not going to happen.



.

 

[Badjedidude]

^^^You're right about that, eris.

Sadly. -_-

Too many people like that.

 

[discolemonade]

I ******* love you, eris.

 

[eris]

 

[Sean]

I am really not directing what I am about to say to ANYONE on this forum. In fact, it is directed at some guy on another forum. Why am I posting it here ? eh, I think it may help.

I know a 25 year old "average" guy. He is average in many ways, and many people would say he is below avarage when it comes to looks.

he has never been out on a date with a girl.

Why ?

They are too ugly.

He was raised on Playboy. He was raised on internet ****.

Average girls are not GOOD ENOUGH for him. He even picks apart people that have "model" good looks.

There are a lot of guys ( and some girls I am sure ) that are like this.

They want what they see on the ****o, and, sorry dude, its probably not going to happen.



.

This is sad/so true.

 

[Luna]

Aww...you guys have made my face like:

Well uh...I hope I don't look as creepy as that, but anyway; I just had to respond back to this very sexy thread, and to all of you very sexy people...individually...boo-yaaa....

Sean// You're so sweet and positive all the time. Don't you ever change.

I am married, and it is EXACTLY like having a sex slave.

Oh, and by the way: yarn can wait some 30-40 years for when we have grandchildren.

Thank for your the post...I'll think of what you've said.

LC// 3-4 times wtf...daily...thanks for the insight. o.o

Or we can just meet up some where and I can **** the brains out of you

LOL

That made me smile ahahaha. xP

Cherry/P2P// TY...I'll try to do other things as per your guys' suggestions...uh...other than crying, creating threads in my hysteria, plotting to destroy humanity etc...I'll try to be more productive.

E_F// Aww...(((hug)))

BJD and Mustache Ladies// @_@ AI YAH.

Edge// Your line of thinking is right. To Eris' post...>>>

Eris// Pet Peeve: Self-proclaimed average guys who ***** and moan about why they cannot get a gorgeous girl, and how they deserve a gorgeous girl because they're so nice.

:club:

Sigh....

 

[cheaptrickfan]

I am really not directing what I am about to say to ANYONE on this forum. In fact, it is directed at some guy on another forum. Why am I posting it here ? eh, I think it may help.

I know a 25 year old "average" guy. He is average in many ways, and many people would say he is below avarage when it comes to looks.

he has never been out on a date with a girl.

Why ?

They are too ugly.

He was raised on Playboy. He was raised on internet ****.

Average girls are not GOOD ENOUGH for him. He even picks apart people that have "model" good looks.

There are a lot of guys ( and some girls I am sure ) that are like this.

They want what they see on the ****o, and, sorry dude, its probably not going to happen.



.

Oh hell yes.

What gets me is this idea that they think that they deserve a Megan Fox or an Angelina Jolie or insert some hot-*** actress/model here. I have known several who really do phrase it like that, as being deserving of a supersonically attractive woman.

I hate the idea that physical beauty is the one quality above all that someone feels has value. Seriously, of what use is beauty like that? Is a beautiful woman automatically smarter, more empathetic, kinder, funnier etc than a more average-looking woman? They aren't necessarily better lays, even.

**** no. I've known too many men who care more about what other people think of the broad hanging on their arm than how they themselves feel about her. Again, it's this idea that a beautiful woman is perceived as more valuable to society than someone less blessed.

Ok, I'll get off my soapbox now. lol /rant

omg don't even get me started on guys who watch so much **** that they think that sex should be like a wild ****o gang bang every ******* night.

ok, ok, now I am really done. /soapbox

 

[SophiaGrace]

Eh, objectification of women in our society has been going on for decades. Thank you **** industry. NOT.

"Feminists argue that women have historically been valued mainly for their physical attributes. Some feminists and psychologists argue that such objectification can lead to negative psychological effects including depression and hopelessness, and can give women negative self-images because of the belief that their intelligence and competence are currently not being, or will never be, acknowledged by society.[10][11] The precise degree to how objectification has affected women and society in general is a topic of academic debate. Such claims include: girls' understanding of the importance of appearance in society may contribute to feelings of fear, shame, and disgust that some experience during the transition from girlhood to womanhood because they sense that they are becoming more visible to society as sexual objects;[12] and that young women are especially susceptible to objectification, as they are often taught that power, respect, and wealth can be derived from one's outward appearance.[13]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_objectification

 

[cheaptrickfan]

Eh, objectification of women in our society has been going on for decades. Thank you **** industry. NOT.

It's not just the sexual objectification, I mean that has gone on for ages. For a long time women were valued only for their child-bearing capacity.

I just reject the idea of taking a whole individual and selecting one quality upon which to judge his or her worth. For that matter, I strenuously object to the idea that we should value a man by his income. A guy who makes a lot of money is not a better person than another man who makes less. A beautiful woman is not a better person just because her facial symmetry is near-perfect.

We are an amalgamation of many qualities, all of which need to be considered if we must assign a value. I suppose I could even go a step further and say that declaring some people more valuable or worthy than others is just not right. I know I've done it though when talking about how certain people contribute nothing to society or are just a "waste of space." :/

I should stop now before I really succumb to full-on misanthropy.

 

[SophiaGrace]

Actually I think some people are of more worth than others.

President of the United States vs. A mine worker. Who do you want to be murdered? You MUST choose between one or the other

You're probably going to pick the mine worker because his sphere of influence is much smaller than our President's.

 

[NOAH_FX]

Sophia, i've never seen you write something so stupid... You CANNOT tell me that the president is more important than anyone. I don't care what his social position is, WE empower that position (We'll you... Im not American.. Thankfully) without someone to rule, their would be no rulers. He is a man, he is flesh and blood he dies.. Just like the rest of us. I don't understand all the hype about these countless idiotic celeb's... and yes, Obama is a Celeb.. Of course people are lonlely, they constantly watch celebs and wish they had THAT life instead of living...

 

[cheaptrickfan]

I could not possibly choose.

I guess what I mean to say is that it is wrong to determine a person's value as a human being solely by what their contribution to society is, and I know I opened that door earlier when I used just those words "contribution to society."

Bear with me, because I am still working out how to express this. I may step over myself and seem to be contradictory, but I am still trying to formulate my thoughts. Plus, I am torn on it.

I dislike the idea that just because someone has more influence or money or... some other quality, then that must automatically translate as that person having more worth, more value, more importance or just being better. Importance and value are relative. Now, the death of the President would affect us all in some way, but that does not mean that his death is more important to me or that HE has more value to me. My kids may not have any "value" to anyone else in the world, but their loss would be the worst possible thing for me. It would have little impact on the lives of random people on the internet, but it does not make it any less important. My kids are far more important than any sitting President.

I am torn about whether or not it is the right thing to do to say that some people are worthless in general. It seems like such a final judgment to be pronouncing, and I don't think that any of us are in a position to make such wide-sweeping judgments. Someone may be worthless to me, but that does not mean that he/she is not important to someone else. I think that very few people are past the point of redemption. Even the most self-absorbed ******* or narcissistic ***** can change if he or she has the proper motivation from within. True sociopaths and people with extreme affective disorders are a different story since they may lack the ability to care about the effect of their actions which limits the desire to change.


Yeah, I don't know. I am still thinking about it. If I am going to continue to wax philosophical, I'm going to need a lot more coffee.

 

[Matej]

Actually I think some people are of more worth than others.

President of the United States vs. A mine worker. Who do you want to be murdered? You MUST choose between one or the other

You're probably going to pick the mine worker because his sphere of influence is much smaller than our President's.

Must choose one. Who do I want murdered? The president of course! (the former us president even more. but that's not the point, is it?)

Why? Because there's every likelihood that the mine worker is more innocent. Don't believe me? meh..


Oh and, eris: where, oh where, might I get such ****? Pwease? For the girls/women I see in **** are average, at best (many are actually ugly and they're fake too. bah). See lots of much more beautiful every day on the street, on the bus, at the beach, wherever. So er.. hmm..

 

[eris]

just being devils advocate here : If there were no mine workers, there would be no electricity. If there was no electricity there would be no internet. If there was no internet there would be no ALL. If there was no ALL we couldnt discuss this.

And men would probably still have those weird neck-beards and wear that arm band thingey. But they would have to chop wood, so they would be HOT.

My uncle works in a coal mine, and he is a HORRIBLE person.

Ok, off track.

Matej - I really kind of agree. I think all playboy girls look EXACTLY the same. I am a fan of ****s, but not fake ones. They have that weird space in the middle and they are too round. ****s arent supposed to be perfectly round like that.

 

[Badjedidude]

Matej - I really kind of agree. I think all playboy girls look EXACTLY the same. I am a fan of ****s, but not fake ones. They have that weird space in the middle and they are too round. ****s arent supposed to be perfectly round like that.

That's one of the main reasons I prefer smaller ****ies.

*shrug*

Those stupid fake balloon-****ies just AIN'T RIGHT. (d)

 

[discolemonade]

Matej - I really kind of agree. I think all playboy girls look EXACTLY the same. I am a fan of ****s, but not fake ones. They have that weird space in the middle and they are too round. ****s arent supposed to be perfectly round like that.

That's one of the main reasons I prefer smaller ****ies.

*shrug*

Those stupid fake balloon-****ies just AIN'T RIGHT. (d)

and this is one of the reasons why I prefer small ***** compared to fake *****. if it's fake, chances are you're not having sex with a guy.

Don't know where I was going with that one

 

[Sean]

s.

Oh and, eris: where, oh where, might I get such ****? Pwease? For the girls/women I see in **** are average, at best (many are actually ugly and they're fake too. bah). See lots of much more beautiful every day on the street, on the bus, at the beach, wherever. So er.. hmm..

I actually have to agree with Matej.
From the **** i've watched, (Not that much . . . ) it seems like the most important feature of a female '**** actor(?)' is her large breasts.

Unlike MANY guys i've talked to . . I think i'd like smaller breasts better.
Maybe I'M the strange one.

Anyways, I've never been a huge fan of **** because it just looks so fake and emotionless. . . .


@Disco . . . I lol'd .

 

[Badjedidude]

and this is one of the reasons why I prefer small ***** compared to fake *****. if it's fake, chances are you're not having sex with a guy.

Don't know where I was going with that one

I'm a real boy.

hehehehehehehehehehehe