ThatOneDude
Well-known member
Depends. If they did it in public, yes. Just chillin, no.
Would it be a deal breaker if the person you are dating was really hairy?
Would it be a deal breaker if the person you are dating was really hairy?
Help Support Loneliness, Depression & Relationship Forum:
Badjedidude
Well-known member
ThatOneDude said:
Haha... kinda, yeah. I like long hair on a woman, but body hair...? Ehhh not my thing, really. I'd be willing to trim my body hair for a lady.... though since I'm a guy it's usually acceptable for me to have more than she does. And I do.
Anyway, as long as she's hygienic with it then it'd be OK. Armpit hair longer than my mustache? No thanks. Would it be a deal-breaker if your date/partner has facial hair? Mustache, beard, etc? (even if it's a girl)????
L
Ladysphinx
Guest
Tthis is the one part in life where I'm pretty fickle but it grosses me out to kiss a guy with facial hair. I honesly did try once to date some one with a mustach and it just didn't work since I avoided kissing the poor guy. I don't mind the look but the feeling when kissing him totally grossed me out.
Same question
I don't mind stuble kinda like that though
Same question
I don't mind stuble kinda like that though
S
Sterling
Guest
Well, I only like men, so I can't answer about a girl having facial hair, but I am just going to guess that it would be a deal breaker unless she shaved or waxed that **** o.o
Anyways, facial hair on men is awesome love it....just don't look like a mountain man.
Would it be a deal breaker if your significant other was bad at kissing, bad in bed, etc?
Anyways, facial hair on men is awesome
love it....just don't look like a mountain man.Would it be a deal breaker if your significant other was bad at kissing, bad in bed, etc?
J
Joseph
Guest
Ladysphinx said:
Oh come on, Ladysphinx!
You know you want a musty, sweaty, food-crumby, warm, slobbery handlebar mustache kiss!
Admit it!
L
Ladysphinx
Guest
nooooo, I really really don't like it. Honestly.
A guy can be a bit hairy on his body but no facial hair no thank you!
A guy can be a bit hairy on his body but no facial hair no thank you!
Badjedidude
Well-known member
Sterling said:
I WILL TEACH YOU MY LOVE!!!
Not a deal-breaker. It would be nice if she were great at sex, but it's not like a prerequisite. Just as long as we're actually HAVING sex (quite often), then she'll just sorta naturally get better as we learn each other's bodies and as she opens up a bit more or whatever.
Would it be a deal-breaker if your date/partner frequently made racist comments... but you weren't sure if they were serious about them or not? Like, they say something racist that could be a joke, but it also seems like it might not be?
L
Ladysphinx
Guest
Deal breaker, joke or not racist comments are wrong.
Would it be a deal breaker if your bf/gf have a mental disorder?
Would it be a deal breaker if your bf/gf have a mental disorder?
Badjedidude
Well-known member
Ladysphinx said:
Depends. If it's something where the person was completely out of it and couldn't recognize me half the time, then yeah it's a deal-breaker. If it makes her compulsively steal or attack people, yes it's a deal-breaker. If it's something like... chronic depression, then no it wouldn't necessarily be something to end the relationship, but it definitely would make things more difficult.
Same question.
L
Ladysphinx
Guest
Deal breaker, I have enough issues as it is adding another one I think I won't be able to cope.
Would it be a dealbreaker for you to be in love with your step/adopted cousin and they feel the same about you?
Would it be a dealbreaker for you to be in love with your step/adopted cousin and they feel the same about you?
SofiasMami
Well-known member
0CI355A said:
Um. Yes. Just yes.
I saw a documentary yesterday called Pray the Gay Away about people who try to reform themselves from being gay for religious reasons.
Would it be a deal breaker if your significant other/spousal equivalent called themselves "ex-gay"?
Teresa
SofiasMami said:
Depends on how they became "ex-gay." If they became so due to religious conditioning then yes that'd be a deal breaker for me but only because I am uncomfortable with someone that into that sort of religion, not because of the gay-ness.
I've dated bisexuals before so if my significant other had once been gay but decided they weren't anymore I'd be okay with that. For whatever reason women don't raise that primal "they are competition to me" urge that men do. *shrug*
Would it be a deal breaker if your significant other had had, say, 100 partners before you?
Badjedidude
Well-known member
Cosmo said:
Not necessarily. It would make things more difficult due to possible diseases or social ramifications for me being with her as a couple... but I wouldn't automatically count her out because of it. Generally there'd have to be a damn good reason she was with that many guys, though. Other than being a whore or a ****star. lol
Same question.
WishingWell
Well-known member
This is funny to you younger people, but my first boyfriend I never called, because I thought it was his place to call me!
Seriously, though, if I was not interested in a guy who called me, I would be upfront and just tell him I wasn't interested. I don't think it is right to let someone hang on and guess what the deal is!
Seriously, though, if I was not interested in a guy who called me, I would be upfront and just tell him I wasn't interested. I don't think it is right to let someone hang on and guess what the deal is!
WishingWell
Well-known member
jjam said:
In answer to the latter question about a guy that is not ambitious, etc., my answer, FROM EXPERIENCE, is NO! Twice, the same thing happened to me. One time with a live-in boyfriend and then another time with the man that I was married to that couldn't hold a job. He wanted to pursue a career in music, but had no money to do anything about it. BOTH TIMES, I ended up supporting the men. With the marriage, I ended up in bankruptcy court!
Now, I wouldn't even date someone unless he took his job/career seriously or wanted to continue his education to further himself in his field of work. It wouldn't matter to me if his income wasn't a high paying amount, but it would have to be AT LEAST enough, for him to pay his share of all bills with some money left over for going out and possibly some savings, in the event that we ended up wanting to be in a relationship and then move in together. (I will not ever get married again, which would be something else we'd have to talk about.)
I am NEVER going to support another man! I will pay for 1/2 of dates, or treat him sometimes or even every other time we would go out. I feel that is fair. To pay a man's share of the bills, feed him, clothe him, etc., is something I WILL NEVER DO AGAIN. In my situation now, I cannot afford to do it financially and just flat out WILL NOT DO IT IF I COULD AFFORD IT. IT IS WRONG! No more dead beats for me! Everyone who is able to should have a job and take responsibility for his/her self, unless the situation is that one of the people in a relationship doesn't work outside the house for whatever reason the couple agrees on. I am now on Disability income, and don't expect to be wined and dined and have gifts bought for me or whatever else someone may expect. I get enough to pay for my bills, food, clothing and have money left over. I am financially responsible, I re-established my credit, and I will pay as much as I can towards everything in a relationship. If I want something that I can't afford, I do without it.
futurecatlady
Well-known member
Dessa said:
Ooold thread, but here goes anyway. It wouldn't be a dealbreaker for me if he engaged in other bits of pop culture (music, movies definitely) but if he was just isolated from any sort of media it might be weird.
Since I'm kind of grappling with this right now: Would it be a dealbreaker if there was no evidence of your date having any friends whatsoever?
Similar threads
