for guys to get laid than for women, BUT wouldn't it be tougher to be the rare woman who can't get ANY action than to be the typical guy who can't get any? Follow me here: The guy who can't get any chicks can always live in denial and blame his "socially awkward ways" or his "pathological shyness", etc. You know the whole, "oh I probably COULD get laid if I actually TRIED" or the "well, it's not that I'm ugly or anything, it's just that I am really shy and women don't go for shy/insecure guys" BS. Women, however, can't hide behind such excuses because they are supposed to be the pursued, which means that if they NEVER get approached by any dudes, well....lol. So in short, even though many more guys than chicks are lonely and sexually-frustrated, I think that it must be more difficult for the individual lonely chick than for the individual lonely guy. I mean, it would REALLY SUCK to be a chick and to NEVER have a SINGLE GUY flirt with you, approach you, hit on you, etc. That fact, in and of itself, pretty much forces you to arrive at the inescapable conclusion/realization that the opposite sex is not the least bit physically attracted to you, and that would kinda be hard to take. Anyway, does anyone else see what I am driving at here?!
Okay so we ALL know that it is tougher
- Thread starter Hiryu
- Start date
Help Support Loneliness, Depression & Relationship Forum:
- Status
EveWasFramed
Well-known member
The only think I see you "driving" at is being banned.
TheRealCallie
Princess Pink Love
Um, I hate to break it to you, but if a woman is straight, she needs a MAN to get laid.
(Have I said that here before? This seems like a deja vu moment)
(Have I said that here before? This seems like a deja vu moment)
EveWasFramed
Well-known member
^^ LOL! 
Badjedidude
Well-known member
^^^I was waiting for that. The warning, I mean. I posted too slowly.
painter's radio
Well-known member
I think you are possibly being deliberately provocative with your posts/threads, but if I'm to look past this and read what you're actually saying, I understand it. It feels no more **** for the girl that never gets hit on than the guy that never gets hit on, both must feel pretty bad. But yes, I can understand what you are saying.
When I look at dating sites and see profiles of women saying "I get 1000000000 messages a day so don't be butthurt if I don't bother replying to you", and they are in the red for never replying to the script-idiots who spam out a generic "hi bbz how r u?" to thousands of girls at a time, and then see some girls in the green and it says no one's messaged them this week/month/whatever, it's at this point what you are saying resonates with me. It's as if these people aren't "good enough" to even be included in the disgusting ape-fest that is online dating. It's horrid.
When I look at dating sites and see profiles of women saying "I get 1000000000 messages a day so don't be butthurt if I don't bother replying to you", and they are in the red for never replying to the script-idiots who spam out a generic "hi bbz how r u?" to thousands of girls at a time, and then see some girls in the green and it says no one's messaged them this week/month/whatever, it's at this point what you are saying resonates with me. It's as if these people aren't "good enough" to even be included in the disgusting ape-fest that is online dating. It's horrid.
W
WildernessWildChild
Guest
The only thing missing is popcorn- I'll be right back....
painter said:
thank you for being both more mature and intelligent/perceptive than the others who have "responded" within this thread. Finally, someone who actually possessed the intellectual (AND spiritual) wherewithal to understand what I have said. Kudos.
Badjedidude
Well-known member
Hiryu said:
You simply must be joking.
Don't even try to pretend as though you have some sort of intellectual high ground simply because someone has indicated that they've understood your message.
I'm not attacking you, but really. Come on.
There's no need to make snide comments about how others have "responded" to your thread, especially when you intentionally used slightly provocative phrasing and baseless assertions. Yes, let's be honest: a lot of what you stated as fact in your original post is debatable.
EVE just ordered me to apologize within the cozy confines of this thread, lest both the Ontario Regional Police and Toronto Police Services be contacted for my incessant cyber harassment/stalking of women. To that end, I now apologize to anyone who was offended by this thread. I am sorry.
TheRealCallie
Princess Pink Love
What the hell is wrong with my response? Last I checked, it's pretty damn true.
W
WildernessWildChild
Guest
Hiryu said:
Badjedidude
Well-known member
Wow. That escalated quickly.
Triple Bogey
Well-known member
I think this self help stuff is boring to be honest.
Rather get advice from actual members of this forum !
Rather get advice from actual members of this forum !
EveWasFramed
Well-known member
Hiryu said:
He's a ******* liar. He PMd me and told me to stop threatening him in his thread.
I told him he wasn't helping anyone and to take the warning seriously. I can post the PMs to prove he's lying.
However, being he's banned, it doesn't matter.
That was a member I'd previously banned under the name Akagi.
For the same kind of crap I might add.
Badjedidude
Well-known member
^^^No worries, Eve.
His story didn't sound like you at all. I didn't believe it for a second.
His story didn't sound like you at all. I didn't believe it for a second.
EveWasFramed
Well-known member
Badjedidude said:^^^No worries, Eve.
His story didn't sound like you at all. I didn't believe it for a second.
Lol, I knew that
I don't order people to apologize - I ban them.
But thanks, Stevers. (hug)
Badjedidude
Well-known member
^^^*hugs*
...also...
dat banhammer. (hello)
...also...
dat banhammer. (hello)
- Status
