I'm glad you appreciated my response enough to answer back. Your comments sound reasonable, but let me add some more points to ponder on the 2 subjects at hand.
Getting a long term working/living visa for another country is always more difficult than a short term tourist visa, and your failure to do so in the prime countries you listed is not surprising at all. Consider, there's little to no chance of any Thai or Filipina girlfriend I might like to bring to the U.S. for a visit of being able to obtain a tourist visa. It took my American friend 2 years and $7000 in attourney's fees to get his Thai wife a visa to join him part time in the states. The U.S. is probably the strictest for legal entry, but Australia, UK, and other desirable immigration countries aren't going to welcome you like the poorer countries. Canada is a mixed bag, having a liberal history of immigration permissiveness but tightening up now, particularly on some African countries. So, kudos to you for researching the prospects, but your window is certainly open to the world; you'll just have to reconsider what countries you might have easier access to. And by the way, many of your real choices are going to be much more affordable than your initial preferences. Even I, as an American with a modest, stable income, rule out beautiful Australia as way too expensive.
A quick google check shows 40-50 countries that are visa friendly to Egyptian travelers - either allowing visa on arrival or reasonable visa in advance policies. Admittedly, this is for 1-3 month visiting tourists, and obtaintng a work/live visa is another matter. I read though that some of these countries are more receptive to working/living than others. With some more research, I'm sure you could narrow the list down. I expect that a working/living visa IS obtainable in some of the world's countries, particularly poorer countries that want immigration and expat dollars - in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America. By, the way, these are the places I'm travelling now, looking for my own new expat life.
I hear you say that you're inclined to just stay in your country after being discouraged with the visa difficulties. Before you settle for that, I suggest you take another look and start with a more sound methodology. The link below is an excellent starting place. Below the top 10 best place to live narratives is the whole table for you to work with. Do some reading there, decide your priorities, then check the visa prospects for the countries that might interest you.
https://internationalliving.com/world-rankings/
A final point I'll make on this subject is the work issue, which I think is your barrier challenge more than being Egyptian. I understand that most countries don't want foreignors coming in and taking their local jobs, and that expats get deported if they're caught working without the proper visa. But, in reality, I see expats working all the time in the various countries I visit, and very few have work visas. The teachers and company contractors get the required paperwork; the others, often doing some independent business off of the internet do not. If you're on a computer all day, not managing or storing product inventory, and not using a local bank for your business, there's really little way that the host country can know that you're working. Out of the hundreds of expats I've met through the years in various countries, I've never met a small timer working an internet business that held a work visa. They easily stay under the radar. I can't judge your situation, but you may consider whether that seems palatable for you. If so, then you'd still be playing the inconvenient visa game like everyone else, but it's doable. You enter on a tourist visa, get extensions, take a short, cheap flight out of the country, and repeat indefinately. It's also worth knowing that many countries have 30 day initial entry time frames on arrival (sometimes 60 with an advance visa) while others have 90 days. Personally, I like those latter ones for my long term stays.
Now, on to the second topic at hand.
I'm pleased to see that you're not as hostile to Christianity as others on this site. I don't expect to convert you here, but I would like to set your perceptions straight on a few points you made.
I'm glad you recognize that religions are different, and I agree too that most of them are man made. I make the exception for Christianity though because of the preponderance of evidence for it above all the others. While some of the other world religions have some historical and archaeological evidence to support them, the Christian Bible has that and more. It has 3 characteristics that go beyond man-made abilities - characteristics requiring supernatural knowledge and power beyond time, space, and matter. The first two, hidden Bible codes and scientific insight, are amazing but debatable characteristics of the written scriptures. The third, fulfilled prophesy, is equally amazing and serves as the primary evidence that the Bible is divinely inspired. In fact, this is the key to finding the truth about any religion. If the founder makes a false prophesy, then he doesn't speak for any all powerful, all knowing, all present god. It follows then that any scriptures or religion developing from that original founder should be considered a false, man-made religion. Now, while some religions (like Islam in particular) like to claim that they have prophesies supporting their scriptures, their examples are all vague, dependent on wild interpretations, or still unfulfilled realities. Of all world religions, I have not heard or read any of their advocates provide any good, solid cases of fulfilled prophesy within their written scriptures - except for Judaism and Christianty. The Bible has hundreds of them, with some of them providing incredible specificity of human people, places, times, and events occurring long after the prophesies were made. There is no substantiated objection to these precise, inerrant "predictions," and no rational explanation other than God being the author of the Bible (both Old and New Testaments). And if that's true, it makes Christianity the one true religion and all of the others false, man-made religions. Even if the Bible had no prophesy in it, many of the other religions could be legitimately discounted because of the false prophesies, scientific, and historical mistakes found within their writings.
So, if for a moment, you were to consider that Christianity might be the one true religion based upon abundant evidence available to you today, let me clarify an important point that relates to your final comment. Most world religions that believe in a soul and afterlife paradise of some sort, teach that the way to get there is by being good and following their man-made rules. Christianity is uniquely different though. It is the only (major) religion based upon a relationship, not works. Christians are saved - by grace - through faith - in Jesus Christ. His sacrifice and resurrection paid the whole price for our sins, making us justified with God. All attempts to be good and loving follow afterwards as a genuine result of that change in heart. We don't earn our way into heaven by our own efforts; we accept the gift of life that God gave us. And if we reject that gift, then we reject God.
You may go through life trying to avoid all religion since you've been given the free will to do so. But, should you desire to know the truth and check the various religions out, remember that Christiany stands upon a relationship with your creator (Jesus, the incarnate person of God), while other religions stand upon the thoughts and rules of men. Don't assume that being a good person makes your soul's fate safe. God wants our hearts, and Jesus is the incarnate form of God. We have to go through him to save our souls.
