onlysoul said:
We should not believe everything thats right! Commend(praise) critical approach ! Something is true, something not. But if it helps people why not ?
Then I suggest the Bible read it, learn it, live it, love it.
I said nothing of not reading it... I suggested reading reviews.
I take it you didn't read his reviews, or even the titles of his other books... like "Chant and be Happy"
He is not honored among his peers, and is a known manipulator, and deceptionist. He's a QUACK and that's a FACT !! That's the whole point I am trying to make, because your feelings don't have anything to do with that.
1. He makes unsupported claims about the power and predictive ability of emotional intelligence.
2. His own, self-created definition of emotional intelligence includes aspects of personality and behavior which are not correlated to emotional intelligence as it is scientifically defined. He also interchanges terms such as emotional literacy, emotional health, emotional skill, and emotional competency. He never defines any of these other terms, but he equates them all to emotional intelligence.
3. He tries to make us believe he is presenting something new, when in fact much of what he is reporting has been studied for years under personality research.
4. He implies that anyone can learn emotional intelligence and fails to acknowledge either the relatively fixed nature of the personality traits he includes in his definition of EI or the differences in innate potential among individuals.
5. He presents himself as the sole expert in emotional intelligence and fails to give adequate credit to Mayer, Salovey, Caruso and others.
6. He represents his work as "scientific" when it does not hold up to scientific scrutiny.
7. His personal beliefs about what is "appropriate" contradict the academic theory concerning the value of our emotions. He still seems to regard emotions as largely something to be controlled and restrained, rather than something to be valued.
8. He has claimed that his ECI -360 test is the "genuine article" when it comes to testing for emotional intelligence, but no one in the academic community seems to think it is even a measure of EI, let alone the "genuine" one.
9. When he wrote his book in 1995 he wanted us to believe the book was about emotional intelligence, but there is strong evidence that Goleman was not intending to write a book about emotional intelligence when he started writing. It seems much more probable that he was actually writing a book about emotional literacy and then later changed the title of the book to "Emotional Intelligence" so his book would have more sales appeal.