The Hookers In My City Are Ugly. Are Yours?

Loneliness, Depression & Relationship Forum

Help Support Loneliness, Depression & Relationship Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
LoneKiller said:
The threads I make that members hate always seem to get the best results and replies. Funny that.

Agreed- **** was pretty profound of me. :cool:
 
Lonely in BC said:
LoneKiller said:
The threads I make that members hate always seem to get the best results and replies. Funny that.

Agreed- **** was pretty profound of me. :cool:
flaneur really put the nail in the coffin on his last reply didn't he? I almost respect that.

 
LoneKiller said:
Lonely in BC said:
LoneKiller said:
The threads I make that members hate always seem to get the best results and replies. Funny that.

Agreed- **** was pretty profound of me. :cool:
flaneur really put the nail in the coffin on his last reply didn't he? I almost respect that.

Meh
 
Lonely in BC said:
LoneKiller said:
Lonely in BC said:
LoneKiller said:
The threads I make that members hate always seem to get the best results and replies. Funny that.

Agreed- **** was pretty profound of me. :cool:
flaneur really put the nail in the coffin on his last reply didn't he? I almost respect that.

Meh

If you are talking about the one with the quotes, it was an ad populum falacy...
 
Felix said:
Lonely in BC said:
LoneKiller said:
Lonely in BC said:
LoneKiller said:
The threads I make that members hate always seem to get the best results and replies. Funny that.

Agreed- **** was pretty profound of me. :cool:
flaneur really put the nail in the coffin on his last reply didn't he? I almost respect that.

Meh

If you are talking about the one with the quotes, it was an ad populum falacy...

Not that I care about "winning," because LK apologized and it's over, but you are wrong. Please correct your knowledge of logic. Then again, I'm not surprised that this is coming from someone who made a shamelessly sexist and - dare I say it? - irrational thread not too long ago in which he fell victim to generalizing. Sweet, sweet irony.
 
flaneur said:
Felix said:
Lonely in BC said:
LoneKiller said:
Lonely in BC said:
Agreed- **** was pretty profound of me. :cool:
flaneur really put the nail in the coffin on his last reply didn't he? I almost respect that.

Meh

If you are talking about the one with the quotes, it was an ad populum falacy...

Not that I care about "winning," because LK apologized and it's over, but you are wrong. Please correct your knowledge of logic. Then again, I'm not surprised that this is coming from someone who made a shamelessly sexist and - dare I say it? - irrational thread not too long ago in which he fell victim to generalizing. Sweet, sweet irony.
Yes. You do care. Don't let it go to your head.

 
Lol, this thread exploded in no time! I only read the first and the last page, I'm too lazy to bother reading the others.

There are street prostitutes, but there are also luxury prostitutes, everywhere in the world. I expect those (the luxury prostitutes) to look very good indeed and to be rather smart too. And except you contact and pay them a lot of money, you usually don't see them and don't know what they look like.
 
LoneKiller said:
The threads I make that members hate always seem to get the best results and replies. Funny that.

But sometimes for the wrong reasons?

I don’t have much net time at the moment so you’ll have to excuse me for being brief with my posts but while I don’t mean to attack you as a person flaneur summed up my thoughts with “I find the possibility that a newcomer can come here and be turned off by offensive thread titles such as this one (without knowing that "it's just LoneKiller again") more appalling than any of the trivial ******** in it”

It’s not the quantity of your threads, sometimes not even the quality, but when things like this are posted in the general chat (a place where most visitors are likely to want to read) I wonder about the impression they will have of the forum. I’d say that most of us here are used to your posts, we know to read them with a pinch of salt and that deep down you may have good intentions but new posters or visitors won’t have that foresight and could well be put off by the subject matter. The same with sympathy for obese people or white people acting black, if those are your immediate thoughts then why not put them in the thoughts thread or if you want a debate post them over in the Up for Debate section?

You know enough about trolling and derailing to understand the problems they cause and while you are more than entitled to post what you want all I ask is that you use a little more discretion and think about the reputation of this forum. I’m not a moderator so by all means I’m not enforcing this but I’ve seen many forums crumble apart due to the antics of regular posters putting off new people from joining and starting their own debates. You’re an intelligent guy and well done for helping other members but the theme of this thread isn’t fitting to represent these forums, I think you know that.
 
LK's posts are like car crash TV, 8 pages virtually all off topic.

I'm not easily offended, the thread title made me chuckle in a face palm sort of way but LK seriously, if nothing else your posts are just providing a conduit for genuine malice like...

Mikey193 said:
Rofl!! My god you guys need to lighten up. There hookers lol

I don't know which I find more depressing; the lack of humanity or spelling of they're.
 
The Good Citizen said:
Mikey193 said:
Rofl!! My god you guys need to lighten up. There hookers lol

I don't know which I find more depressing; the lack of humanity or spelling of they're.

The humanity. Many a serial killer that targeted hookers has said the same - "They're hookers, the scum of humanity, I was doing everyone a service by slitting their throats." A la gary ridgeway, the green river killer, a la jack the ripper, etc etc

I'm morally disgusted anyone would say such a flippant comment like this.

Besides, we have a member here that used to be in the sex trade, actually two that I can think of now that I remember. I wonder how they'd feel about this debasing comment. Actually, I find it disrespectful to them.
 
LK -- Tried to send this to you in a PM, but I found that it's disabled...

I hope you are OK. Take care of yourself.
 
The Good Citizen said:
LK's posts are like car crash TV, 8 pages virtually all off topic.

I'm not easily offended, the thread title made me chuckle in a face palm sort of way but LK seriously, if nothing else your posts are just providing a conduit for genuine malice like...

Mikey193 said:
Rofl!! My god you guys need to lighten up. There hookers lol

I don't know which I find more depressing; the lack of humanity or spelling of they're.
your joking me. He just asked if hookers in your area. We're good looking or ugly. There is nothing wrong with that he didn't say he was gonns kill them or anything bad. Would people get offended if I asked. Are the girls in your area ugly or pretty?

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top