Abstamyous
Well-known member
My attempt to find an easier way to deliver children, has turned into me planning a summer vacation. Didn't think I'd reach this point so soon.
Three words....test tube baby. No delivery required. LolMy attempt to find an easier way to deliver children, has turned into me planning a summer vacation. Didn't think I'd reach this point so soon.
Mine will be 94 next week.My aunt is 76 now. I'm terrified.
It's hot over here too, but I don't mind for now.Hot weather is such killjoy.
Agree! I recently saw a socal media post where the person referred to their cat as their ‘son’ - I thought it was extremely odd. . . and kinda icky.I can't be the only one totally weirded out by how people nowadays are referring to their pets as their "sons" and "daughters"
It's the single most stupid trend I've seen humanity undergo in a while, and that's saying something.
It's extremely icky!! I don't get it at all. I get visuals of women giving birth to dogs What the heck, humanity?!Agree! I recently saw a socal media post where the person referred to their cat as their ‘son’ - I thought it was extremely odd. . . and kinda icky.
N/A“No good deed goes unpunished” is so true. Why do I always wear the cost of helping people out, making other people’s lives better, doing them a favour? One is forced into being selfish if one wants to live as one wishes.
We all love a bit of recognition, but let’s not get carried away with handing out kudos like it’s going out of fashion. While it’s grand to give people their flowers, there’s a risk of turning it into a bit of a circus. When we constantly bang on about someone’s achievements, it can lead to a culture of showboating, where people do things just to get a pat on the back. Not to mention, it leaves the unsung heroes, the grafters in the background, out in the cold. Let’s not let applause become the be-all and end-all, eh?Your post in the kudos thread? That didn’t belong there. I challenged it myself if you recall, because it went against the ethos of the thread.
By all means you can call out the behaviour you mention above, but at the same time, the person you were replying to didn’t need calling out.
Settle petal. It's a specific thread for kudos, and nobody is doing that. Sheesh. Maybe you feel like you're missing out?...... but let’s not get carried away with handing out kudos like it’s going out of fashion.
I'm an atheist and I don't see it that way. You obviously have a narrow minded viewpoint.The post comes across as negative because it frames the community as "antagonistic to any Christian perspective,"
Right, I get it, but it’s not about missing out. I just think we should be mindful of how things are worded, especially when it can be read in different ways. And as for the narrow-minded comment, that’s a bit unfair. I’m just pointing out how the post might come across to others, not attacking anyone's beliefs. Let’s keep it civil and respect different perspectives.Settle petal. It's a specific thread for kudos, and nobody is doing that. Sheesh. Maybe you feel like you're missing out?
I'm an atheist and I don't see it that way. You obviously have a narrow minded viewpoint.
Again, it was a kudos thread and nobody else had any issue with it. Your deleted response to it could have been posted elsewhere, and wasn't appropriate for the thread. I don't think I was being unfair by saying your viewpoint was narrow minded because you obviously failed to see SirJoseph's post for what it was and made an inference based on your beliefs. Calling your viewpoint narrow minded wasn't uncivil at all and the way I supported SirJoseph absolutely shows that I respect different perspectives, whereas I don't uphold people blatantly going against the ethos of a thread just to disparage the opinion of other's beliefs, especially when no apology was given. You bang on about freedom of speech and yet you can't afford the same to someone else.Right, I get it, but it’s not about missing out. I just think we should be mindful of how things are worded, especially when it can be read in different ways. And as for the narrow-minded comment, that’s a bit unfair. I’m just pointing out how the post might come across to others, not attacking anyone's beliefs. Let’s keep it civil and respect different perspectives.
Look, I’ve had a read of your post, and there are a few things that don’t sit right with me. First off, calling my viewpoint "narrow-minded" isn’t exactly the most civil way of putting it, is it? You might not agree with me, but there’s a way to do it without coming across like you’re having a go. It’s not like I "failed to see" SirJoseph’s post, I just had a different take on it. We’re allowed to have different opinions.Again, it was a kudos thread and nobody else had any issue with it. Your deleted response to it could have been posted elsewhere, and wasn't appropriate for the thread. I don't think I was being unfair by saying your viewpoint was narrow minded because you obviously failed to see SirJoseph's post for what it was and made an inference based on your beliefs. Calling your viewpoint narrow minded wasn't uncivil at all and the way I supported SirJoseph absolutely shows that I respect different perspectives, whereas I don't uphold people blatantly going against the ethos of a thread just to disparage the opinion of other's beliefs, especially when no apology was given. You bang on about freedom of speech and yet you can't afford the same to someone else.
Now, let's move on.
You’ve mentioned that "nobody else had any issue" with SirJoseph’s post." Well, that’s not what I’ve been hearing. Plenty of people have told me they felt the same way I do about it, but either they didn’t want to get involved or just couldn’t be bothered to say anything.Again, it was a kudos thread and nobody else had any issue with it. Your deleted response to it could have been posted elsewhere, and wasn't appropriate for the thread. I don't think I was being unfair by saying your viewpoint was narrow minded because you obviously failed to see SirJoseph's post for what it was and made an inference based on your beliefs. Calling your viewpoint narrow minded wasn't uncivil at all and the way I supported SirJoseph absolutely shows that I respect different perspectives, whereas I don't uphold people blatantly going against the ethos of a thread just to disparage the opinion of other's beliefs, especially when no apology was given. You bang on about freedom of speech and yet you can't afford the same to someone else.
Now, let's move on.
Enter your email address to join: