TheSkaFish
Jedi Guardian
Rodent said:Harsh words nonetheless.
I thought the E-word was more about not taking every pleasantry for granted. Personally I don't regard human rights and decency as a mere pleasantry. But whenever people are exposed to friendly gestures, grace and indulgence of others they tend to see these merits as natural and abuse them eventually. And complain about it on top.
I should be clear - this post is in reaction to a Psychology Today article that I was going to read but when I saw the title, I could not read it.
I guess the first thing to ask would be to say, what is an essential and what is a pleasantry? Some people would list quite a few things as essential. Others would list everything, including life itself, as a pleasantry. There are more people who think that way than we would imagine.
Rodent said:On the other hand, the one that promotes the survival of the fittest should have his position of strength well covered. Otherwise he might end up a victim of his own teachings...
For the record, I don't promote survival of the fittest. I would be on the side of more things being essentials. There are far less essentials than pleasantries of course, but I still believe that these are essential nonetheless. However a lot of people would view those, such as a home or kindness and honesty, as a pleasantry.
It just aggravates me that we have this contradiction between how we are supposed to be such a polite, considerate, i-love-everyone society, but at the same time if someone is hurting and wants or needs a break, there is a considerable number of people that will tell you to shut up and stop being entitled. They are smug and condescending and I think it would be nice to see them get burned for a change. They remind me of people who go to church every Sunday, but in actuality are as far from Christian as you can get. I would just like some honesty. Either we are an "I-love-everyone, yaaaay!" society, or let's just be real, take the kid gloves off, and do some anarchy. Whichever we pick let's be honest about it so we're all playing the same game.
I also hate how it is applied to my generation. The article was something dealing with "...the Age of Entitlement". That is ********. What this age is, is a time when a lot of information on how to make it in life, from professional, personal, or anything else, has been proven to be outdated and no longer valid, or just wrong from the get-go. The misinformation was either intentional or unintentional, but it's wrong nonetheless and doesn't solve the problems at hand. So for someone to be angry or even confused by that is not them "acting entitled". We're walking on a bridge as per directions that were given to us, but while we walked, someone dynamited the bridge. Whether that was done on purpose or not is unclear. Yes all one can do is solve their own problems. But don't anyone dare call us entitled. That's what I'm talking about.