E
Ecclesiastes
Guest
Another MGTOW internet philosopher who thinks they know all women better than they know themselves.
Ecclesiastes said:Another MGTOW internet philosopher who thinks they know all women better than they know themselves.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:ardour said:Celibacy is up by 30% for men in their 20s, compared to 8% for women.
Who... cares?
Again, it's a byproduct with many other factors and causes. God, you and your like-minded pal here really put too much stake into things like ***. Sure do wonder why.... yep...
Didn't I tell you before that it was obvious to women what the only thing you really want out of them is?
Thanks for making it even more blatant.
TheRealCallie said:Enpatsu No Shakugan said:ardour said:Celibacy is up by 30% for men in their 20s, compared to 8% for women.
Who... cares?
Again, it's a byproduct with many other factors and causes. God, you and your like-minded pal here really put too much stake into things like ***. Sure do wonder why.... yep...
Didn't I tell you before that it was obvious to women what the only thing you really want out of them is?
Thanks for making it even more blatant.
You sure seem to enjoy harassing some people, why is that? Does it make you feel superior or a sense of control? You know how that makes you look, right?
Also, I think it's already been established that men don't know what women want/think, yet here you are saying it's obvious what women think?
Back to the whole "OMG I'm a virgin" thing, the "studies" don't give actual reasons WHY those people are not having ***, all they offer are possibilities. The reasons could be endless. People wanting to wait til they are married, disabilities that make it hard to have ***, people choosing to be asexual or similar and just simply have no desire for ***, hiding inside and only doing "online" dating and having cyber *** instead of actual ***. You don't know, so stop with the "knowing" that it's only so called "nice guys" who get passed over for the "bad boys." Fact of the matter is, none of you actually know.
michael2 said:We live in a society where women have been built up and men relentlessly torn down. It's gotten so bad women have essentially become untouchable. ... Meanwhile a guy with a 'dad bod' is mercilessly trashed.
Naturally women still desire a degree of male validation but that can easily be found on social media. This leaves men seeking female validation from women who are his physical and social equal. But he can't get it because those women get their validation online and don't need to get it from him.
michael2 said:The common criticism of incels is that these men think they are entitled to ***. Common critiques are for these men to improve themselves and stop whining. Such responses are typical misandry you see on a daily basis. When men have problems, they are simply told to shut up and pull ther boot straps up and deal with it.
Think for a second that an incel has to endure. He's constantly told by society and media what a loser he is for not having a girlfriend or ***, not to mention his natural tendencies for wanting love from the opposite ***. So a significant portion of his self worth is tied up with female validation. When women, even those equal to him in status and physical looks ignore him because they get their validation from social media, this can be devastating. It's like an eco system that has been thrown out of balance and because men, not women are getting the raw deal nobody cares.
michael2 said:I agree women have issues they have to deal with as well. But being an average looking guy nowadays is insufferable. If you don't have 6 pack abs or an aggressive dominating personality your considered inferior, or a beta male.
michael2 said:When is the issue ever women? They are never held accountable. If a man says on his dating profile he wants a woman with large breasts, then he is a sexist who sees women as objects. If a woman writes on her dating profile she wants a man at least 6' tall with 6 pack abs she's just describing the guy she wants physically and won't be judged.Issue is you, not women.
michael2 said:Tell me how much self improvement Chad put in to be so attractive to women? He lifted some weights?
What effort are women putting into improving themselves? Or are they perfect as they are like what feminism wants us to believe? And men are toxic dirty losers who need to shape up to be to worthy of perfect women.
ardour said:^Confidence is connected to stereotypical notions of masculinity, whether you want to admit that or not, so you're kind of re-enforcing his point (that self-improvement is only expected of men).
I don't really agree with the Chad/Stacey, 80/20 crap, since it's obviously a ridiculous exaggeration, but men are facing a lot of mixed messages lately. On one hand cishet males are 'toxic' with entitlement and a threat to everyone around them. Yet they're still expected to be the initiators, to carry and earn relationships and exemplify stoicism while doing it. It's no wonder socially awkward men become bitter and buy into certain ideas to try to explain it all.
Bluesunshineday said:This is so scary to me...this attitude.
Can we educate and help??
TheRealCallie said:I don't base who I am attracted to on looks alone. Personality is far more important to me, as is who the guy is on the inside.
TheRealCallie said:Perhaps part of your problem is that you seem all about negativity, whereas "Chad" has confidence and knows how to put a good foot forward.
TheRealCallie said:But a lot of people confuse confidence with arrogance. "Chad" has both, confidence gets him in the door, but that confidence is soon revealed to be arrogance. A lot of people can't tell the difference at first meetings unless it's very obvious.
TheRealCallie said:So yeah "Chad" might get more dates, but how successful is he at maintaining those relationships?
TheRealCallie said:That said, Chad is likely an *******
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:The issue is you, not women. Convincing yourself of this conspiracy and being around others who propagate that notion has and will continue to do nothing for you.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:These guys make it their defining trait
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:don't want to do the work (IE, self-improvement, introspection, not blaming others) that would actually fix their issues.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:They ***** and moan loudly
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Even trying to help them and say there are many types of women, and maybe they're after the wrong types, etc, and even when I say I've lived these experiences too; you only get replies of "Where do these women exist? I want to go there!" or the like.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Even though what I'm describing is 99% of women and they're everywhere. The women who posted in THIS topic are further proof that almost no woman acts like the "Stacy" they've built up in their minds.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:But see, it's always outside forces; someone else's fault. It wouldn't matter if they changed location or any other superficial thing they think will help; THEY, with their inane and idiotic mindset are the real turn off, so they'll see it wherever they are, wherever they go, because it's them that is the problem.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:But the fact you view "Men who are still virgins past a certain age" as some sort of outbreak is absolutely hysterical.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Maybe when you stop viewing women as solely tools to get your **** wet
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:you can learn that *** isn't the most important thing ever.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:all you really care about is free ***
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:and any woman worth her weight picks up on that right away and rightfully wants no part of you.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:"Stacy" and "Chad"; literally those are the only two words you say all day, I'd wager.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Richard_39 said:You know, as much as I don't agree with that mindset or the whole incel movement, man makes a sad point. It IS at a historic high. At some point, people with knowledge on human psychology should really, in depth, study the phenomena and figure out exactly what is wrong.
Can we really just casually toss it on social media? Or is there really a much deeper culture problem beneath it? I wonder.
I'd chalk it up that people are maturing at a much slower rate these days for a multitude of reasons (easier lives, less responsibilities, longer lifespans, etc), and *** just happens to be one of the side-effects in that process.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:making people less socially adept
the guys who aren't socially ******** who can get girls
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:ardour said:Celibacy is up by 30% for men in their 20s, compared to 8% for women.
Who... cares?
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:God, you and your like-minded pal here really put too much stake into things like ***. Sure do wonder why.... yep...
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Didn't I tell you before that it was obvious to women what the only thing you really want out of them is?
Thanks for making it even more blatant.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:and at least we know they're the last of their generation and there won't be more of them, at least from their bloodlines.
Not a bad outcome, honestly.
...
Like I said, good. Women deserve better.
...
Also, we even have cures for that. It's called a hooker. So either go get laid or shut up already with this incessant whining.
Probably. He thinks he can cow them, that they won't put up a fight. Not this fish, though.TheRealCallie said:You sure seem to enjoy harassing some people, why is that? Do it make you feel superior or a sense of control? You know how that makes you look, right?
Bluesunshineday said:Thank you for your message - it is inspiring. I too feel like I need to get things right with myself before I enter a relationship. I didn't realise it would take this long to sort myself out after I fell though. Five years and I'm still slowly creeping upwards.
I too find it hard to leave the house unless I have to for work. What kinds of socialising have you been doing?
Oh, and keeping on point with this thread.
I can't speak for all women, but I've been around a while now and I know that the majority of women are looking for someone that treats them well that they enjoy spending time with.
If you want a partner being someone that treats others well and is nice to spend time with goes soooooo much further than a muscly body. Personally I don't like muscly bodies. It shows that the man is far too into his appearance. But everyone is different.
Everyone is different :shy:
TheSkaFish said:michael2 said:We live in a society where women have been built up and men relentlessly torn down. It's gotten so bad women have essentially become untouchable. ... Meanwhile a guy with a 'dad bod' is mercilessly trashed.
Naturally women still desire a degree of male validation but that can easily be found on social media. This leaves men seeking female validation from women who are his physical and social equal. But he can't get it because those women get their validation online and don't need to get it from him.
It's the SkaFish Wall of Text Show. Read at your peril!
You know, I find it ironic that you mention the "dad bod" because I remember one of my favorite models saying somewhere on YouTube that she liked "dad bods". I thought to myself, "sooo, howYOU doin'...." lol. Anyway. I don't think that's the issue here, I haven't seen anyone get trashed for it. And I don't think the situation is as extreme as you or some others online have said. It's easy to exaggerate when you are in despair. I am too. But, I do think that there's definitely something going on.
I've heard about the social media thing too, and one thing I try to do is that if I'm attracted to a woman online, I try to avoid "liking" or commenting on photos of herself, and only about pictures or other posts about her interests, or if she actually says or does something I think is cool. I try to make sure I send the message that I'm not here to be an orbiter, to be used for validation, I'm here to talk about the things about them that I find interesting and hopefully connect. I don't think it's a magic answer, but I try to be more conscious of any little thing I can do to avoid them categorizing me as some kind of inferior, and instead as an equal, someone to take seriously.
michael2 said:The common criticism of incels is that these men think they are entitled to ***. Common critiques are for these men to improve themselves and stop whining. Such responses are typical misandry you see on a daily basis. When men have problems, they are simply told to shut up and pull ther boot straps up and deal with it.
Think for a second that an incel has to endure. He's constantly told by society and media what a loser he is for not having a girlfriend or ***, not to mention his natural tendencies for wanting love from the opposite ***. So a significant portion of his self worth is tied up with female validation. When women, even those equal to him in status and physical looks ignore him because they get their validation from social media, this can be devastating. It's like an eco system that has been thrown out of balance and because men, not women are getting the raw deal nobody cares.
That's another common theme I've seen, which frankly pisses me off. Nobody seems to want to hear when men are having a hard time, nobody wants to offer compassion or even a space to vent, let alone actually telling men what to do to fix things beyond the generic "self-improve", like what does that even mean. You're supposed to know this stuff instinctively, and if you don't, people just write you off as weak and inherently inferior, and your suffering is right and natural. It's funny because people seem to preach self-improvement to men as the answer, but also believing in biological determinism at the same time. I always think, what if you try self-improvement and it doesn't work? This "advice", it always seems insincere, like they tell you to self-improve while not really believing that you can, because it's more about them wanting to come off as the good guy than about actually helping you figure this out. I feel like it's pretty sick that for what is to some people a genuine cause of distress, others who have mostly never been in this situation or only got out due to dumb luck feel like it's a joke.
And the whole "entitled to ***" thing is particularly aggravating, because that's basically one of the key parts of the "alpha male" personality. Yet nobody ever seems to care about that. The funny thing is, if you try to have some confidence or try to assert yourself like they say a man is supposed to, then they turn around and use the word "entitled" to try and beat you back down into your place. It makes you feel like you're never going to be good enough. Honestly I think it's just a word that people use to invalidate and socially police people they feel are weaker than them, and that's pretty much it.
While nobody is saying anyone should be forced to date anyone they don't like, wanting to be with someone sexually, romantically, emotionally is a valid human wish, much more central to our well-being than something like being rich or a celebrity. It's not an "extra". So all this "entitled to ***" stuff, well, **** that noise.
And I totally hear you about society and the media. Society says be confident, don't base your self worth on others, and all that, then turns around and virgin-shames you. It's another one of these double standards.
michael2 said:I agree women have issues they have to deal with as well. But being an average looking guy nowadays is insufferable. If you don't have 6 pack abs or an aggressive dominating personality your considered inferior, or a beta male.
I'd say it's this, right here - not the 6 pack, but the aggressive, competitive, dominating, hierarchical personality. Traditionally masculine interests, loudness, popularity, vulgarity, sarcasm, "negging", and crude sexual slang or innuendoes, booze and drugs, money, violence, or breaking the law (or at least the illusion of these things), objectifying women (ironically), an attitude of superiority, and either the business ****** or the industrial worker/redneck/outlaw/burnout archetype. That's the thing I've seen is the most surefire way of attracting a woman. Someone can say it's not nice to say that, or it's misogynistic, or whatever. But I'm not saying this to be offensive. I'm saying it because I've witnessed it, many times.
It seems the only way around that is by being very successful, like being nearly a pro athlete or musician or actor, being a CEO or some other very well-paid position, being a member of an elite military unit, being some kind of extreme sports guy, or something like that. It would be nice if we could all just "work hard" and "believe in ourselves" and "not give up" until we could get to this level, but I'm not sure if it's possible. For me, a big thing that I ponder, maybe too much, is the idea of natural, genetic talent vs. hard work. Born vs made, nature vs nurture. Which is more important? If your genetics, your nature are all zeroes, what can you really do?
Other than that, the only other option seems to be dumb luck. Hoping and wishing. It's frustrating because it's like people feel like the only reason a guy isn't macho is because he's like you said, some kind of biologically inferior beta male, and not because he just doesn't have those interests, doesn't come from that culture, just doesn't feel the need to be that way.
michael2 said:When is the issue ever women? They are never held accountable. If a man says on his dating profile he wants a woman with large breasts, then he is a sexist who sees women as objects. If a woman writes on her dating profile she wants a man at least 6' tall with 6 pack abs she's just describing the guy she wants physically and won't be judged.Issue is you, not women.
Truth. Again, I haven't seen the 6 pack thing, but I've seen the height thing lots of times. Luckily for me height isn't my problem, but still. Another double standard.
That's the thing though. As long as you still want a woman, there's nothing any of us can really do about this. Sometime between now and our parents' day, the culture changed, values changed. I find that there's a lot of parallels between dating and capitalism. You can say the system sucks all day, but as long as it has something you want or need, you have no choice but to learn the rules and play the game.
michael2 said:Tell me how much self improvement Chad put in to be so attractive to women? He lifted some weights?
What effort are women putting into improving themselves? Or are they perfect as they are like what feminism wants us to believe? And men are toxic dirty losers who need to shape up to be to worthy of perfect women.
A lot of these guys? Not ****. Words like "self-improvement", "hard work", and "discipline" aren't in their dictionary, not that they have one. A lot of these guys can't even be assed to go to the gym, and I can tell because they have no muscle tone. They get by on just being born into a strong-fat body type, and a macho personality. It's sort of amazing how far you can go on these two things alone.
Recently I looked up some people I went to school with online, just to see what the deal is. These guys were the shady people, kind of like a cross between Jersey Shore guidos and Homer Simpson, if he was a ******. Most of them are straight-up fat, and talk about nothing except generic macho interests. They all talk and look more or less the same, and like whatever culture is popular right now. They seem to have very little ambition beyond getting a cozy job where they don't have to think much, and they don't seem to do anything except drink and yell in various places. And yet, almost all of these guys either have a girlfriend, or are even married. Granted, I wouldn't be interested in the women they're with, but still. I feel like I have to do all this work just to "have a personality" or "be interesting" or whatever, and it might be beyond my abilities or it just might not work, and these guys basically have to just show up, drunk, loud, slovenly, not really good at anything and no intellectual curiosity and not even in shape or good-looking, and it's OK. I can't help but feel like, what the **** man, seriously.
To be fair, a lot of women actually do put a lot of work into being attractive, at least physically. But where a lot of them don't seem to do much work, is personality-wise. I can't tell you how many dating profiles I've seen that list traveling, pizza, wine, country, rap, or EDM, "going out and staying in", and "loving to laugh" as their interests, if that much, and they all more or less talk and think the same way. I don't know how I'd talk to someone like this even if I wanted to. And I don't, cause I want someone I want to explore, and can share my interests and enthusiasm with and would take me in a direction I want to go. But people like that are few and far between, and also think they are better than me, I guess.
I don't know, man. All I can say is, somewhere along the line culture changed, people got colder and more into status and power, and I think we have to accept that we have to do more work to be good enough than the machos, and maybe even the average guy, and we have less margin for error. People don't WANT to give us a break, we have to overcome their prejudgment that we are lesser. As non-macho men, our fitness, intelligence, sense of style, abilities, knowledge base, finances, and all that has to be on point, and we have to make sure that when talking to a woman we want to date, we have to look like our life is some kind of party all the time, and to show as little weakness as possible. It's just the way it is.
ardour said:^Confidence is connected to stereotypical notions of masculinity, whether you want to admit that or not, so you're kind of re-enforcing his point (that self-improvement is only expected of men).
I don't really agree with the Chad/Stacey, 80/20 crap, since it's obviously a ridiculous exaggeration, but men are facing a lot of mixed messages lately. On one hand cishet males are 'toxic' with entitlement and a threat to everyone around them. Yet they're still expected to be the initiators, to carry and earn relationships and exemplify stoicism while doing it. It's no wonder socially awkward men become bitter and buy into certain ideas to try to explain it all.
Right you are. I've seen something like "women are loved for who they are, while men are loved for what they do" or something similar, a couple times. Of course, this doesn't apply to the machos, who get out of jail free.
The thing I think is, as a male, it seems like you can't just do whatever, be any way you want to be. There are tons of unspoken rules, or things that are presented as choices if they're presented at all, but are more like rules. And there's all these nuances. "Be yourself" - except when your interests and personality aren't macho. "Don't worry about fitting in or being popular or cool" - except that's what a lot of women wind up going for. "Be nice, get good grades, stay out of trouble" - except that it gets everyone to see you as a lame and sometimes fighting is the answer. "Don't be shallow and judge people for their looks and money or act like you're better than anyone else" - except that the "cool" guys do, and it doesn't hurt them at all. "Women like sweet guys" - except that they tend to go for guys who are into violence, sarcasm, vulgarity, sexual slang and innuendos, the game of insults and comebacks, and an air of superiority. "It's OK to be sensitive and non-macho, talk about your feelings" - except when it gets women to see you as naturally weak and inherently inferior, like it is right in this thread.
Bluesunshineday said:This is so scary to me...this attitude.
Can we educate and help??
What's scary to me is how social Darwinism seems to be on the rise, and there seems to be less and less compassion for people whose interests, personality, and background don't match the new culture and values. "I've got mine, screw you" and "if you can't compete, you're inferior" seems to be getting more and more common.
As for educating and helping, one thing that would help is for women to say what they actually want. I've seen it said many times that in our society, women are "pressured to be nice", due to gender roles, keeping up appearances, and a desire to avoid conflict. I say, say what you mean. If you want a nice and sweet and sensitive guy, say so. If you want a sarcastic, insulting guy, or a lewd and crude overly sexual guy, or a guy who looks like he's spent his whole life in and out of jail, or a guy who shows up in a Ferrari, say so. Own it, no matter how nice or nasty, and decide what is really "you". Don't say what you think your parents or friends or society wants to hear.
Same with guys. They should be told something like "go ahead and be 'nerdy' if you want, but realize that it's probably going to make finding a girlfriend harder" instead of "be yourself" or "do whatever you want". Or "sometimes you have to curse someone out or fight, even though you will probably get in trouble for this" instead of "be nice".
The more people know, the more they can make informed choices instead of just doing whatever and wondering why it doesn't work. I think a little honesty on all sides would go a long way.
TheRealCallie said:I don't base who I am attracted to on looks alone. Personality is far more important to me, as is who the guy is on the inside.
That's actually pretty admirable. Not being sarcastic either. But you have to understand that it's also not that common.
TheRealCallie said:Perhaps part of your problem is that you seem all about negativity, whereas "Chad" has confidence and knows how to put a good foot forward.
It's easy for "Chad" to have confidence because things have been going his way literally from birth, so why wouldn't he be confident when he knows no other way? At some point in his early youth, he realizes he is bigger and stronger and/or richer than others, and believes it must be that he is inherently better than them. Or, he's from a "hard" culture, and only presented one choice for his personality. He makes friends with like-minded guys, and life pretty much lets them coast for the rest of their days. Nothing ever threatens to kick their *** or show them up or force them to shut up, drop the ego, and get in line.
Meanwhile as a non-macho man, things rarely ever go your way, and probably nobody even tells you why cause they don't know themselves. It starts to feel pretty hopeless when you try different things, but no matter what you do, it just doesn't budge. It looks so easy for everyone else but you, you're frozen out. I can't remember if I was ever told this specifically, but I've heard "just be confident" before. But the problem with that is, it's incomplete advice. Confidence comes from past wins, things you are good at, things you can beat others at, times where you made things go your way with your power, cunning, or skill. If you don't have any past wins or special skills, things you seem to just naturally take to, then you're going to have a hard time justifying a confident attitude.
TheRealCallie said:But a lot of people confuse confidence with arrogance. "Chad" has both, confidence gets him in the door, but that confidence is soon revealed to be arrogance. A lot of people can't tell the difference at first meetings unless it's very obvious.
I have yet to hear of a woman break up with a man because of arrogance, let alone refusing to give him a chance in the first place because of arrogance. Maybe it happens, but I don't think it's common.
TheRealCallie said:So yeah "Chad" might get more dates, but how successful is he at maintaining those relationships?
From what I've seen? Very. It seems like a simple formula, even: remember to smooth-talk and pepper your conversations with insults and comebacks or sexual innuendoes, or just insult other people or things to make yourself seem cooler/tougher/"edgier" by comparison. Then all you have to do is don't beat, don't cheat, rinse wash repeat. At least that's how it looks to me.
TheRealCallie said:That said, Chad is likely an *******
Well, thanks for admitting that much. It's better than nothing, I'll take it!
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:The issue is you, not women. Convincing yourself of this conspiracy and being around others who propagate that notion has and will continue to do nothing for you.
Couldn't it possibly be that at least a part of this is that culture changed, and what used to be good advice for attracting women is now out of date? Or that some people's interests, personality, body, and culture aren't favored in this area of life?
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:These guys make it their defining trait
It's kind of forced on them. Hence, "involuntary".
Besides, what other traits could they have instead? Personally, I fear that guys wind up this way because they're both untalented (and therefore unable to really cultivate other traits effectively), and not macho, which is how most machos get around not having to bother with talent or knowledge or cultivating a unique personality.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:don't want to do the work (IE, self-improvement, introspection, not blaming others) that would actually fix their issues.
See, this is what I'm talking about. You say self-improvement is the answer one minute, then you say no, they're all ****** because of biological determinism the next. Which is it? Would self-improvement fix their issues, or are they too untalented or genetically inferior to self-improve in any meaningful way?
I've personally read countless articles and typed pages of introspection to myself, going over my entire life and trying to figure out how I got here. I feel like I've finally figured out a lot, but I wish I'd known all this stuff sooner.
And I've tried to self-improve in various ways. But nothing happened, not with women, not even with the things I was trying to improve at. And I'm not the only one. I've never been a member of any incel forums, and I don't plan to either, but I read some stuff there just to see what kinds of people are on there anyway and what their situation is really like instead of letting the media tell me what to think and seeing if their situation was like mine, and if you don't count the trolls and extremely stereotypical nerds, some of them are actually fairly regular people. That's the scary part. A lot of these guys, they lift weights, they stay in shape, they're educated and have at least half-decent to good jobs, they read and have interests and hobbies, they have their own place, and some of them even have nice cars. They do everything a man is supposed to and all the "self-improvement" ****, but no women care. Some of them seem like well-spoken people with a decent enough disposition, but the main thing seems to be they all lack that aggressive, competitive, dominant, hierarchical personality. They don't have that "edgy", sarcastic, mocking, sneering tone. None of them seem very casually superior or rebellious either. I think women think of them as "boringly friendly" middle-class guys. They come across as too mild, no thrills, no suspense. They don't have power to lord over anyone. They come across as too G-rated, too Disney, not offensive or dangerous - at least not in the "cool" sense of those terms, the kind that comes from a place of power instead of frustration. And I'm not sure what anyone can do about that.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:They ***** and moan loudly
Remind us about this next time something is getting you down.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Even trying to help them and say there are many types of women, and maybe they're after the wrong types, etc, and even when I say I've lived these experiences too; you only get replies of "Where do these women exist? I want to go there!" or the like.
That still doesn't really help though. I've seen difference in personalities and interests, but not so much the guys they choose. What makes someone "wrong" or "right" anyway? It's more than common interests or being able to hold a conversation, that's for sure. And what if I don't like anyone that is "right" for me, because the only thing that makes them "right" is common problems, the main thing I have in common with the person is something that I wish I didn't have?
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Even though what I'm describing is 99% of women and they're everywhere. The women who posted in THIS topic are further proof that almost no woman acts like the "Stacy" they've built up in their minds.
I wouldn't say that people on a forum for loneliness - and I include myself here - are an accurate representation of the mainstream population. No offense, but we're here mostly because of problems, not because everything goes our way. How people feel and think about things on here isn't necessarily what most people feel and think, cause they don't have our personalities and haven't had our experiences. I don't like using these terms, but you're not going to hear from "Stacies" in a place like this, cause they just aren't going to be here.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:But see, it's always outside forces; someone else's fault. It wouldn't matter if they changed location or any other superficial thing they think will help; THEY, with their inane and idiotic mindset are the real turn off, so they'll see it wherever they are, wherever they go, because it's them that is the problem.
Again, what can they do? Try and get good at things they may not be able to, or even be interested in? Adopt personalities way outside of their culture and everything they agree with or makes sense for them to be?
Personal responsibility can help with some things, but sometimes it doesnt do anything, and sometimes there really is someone to blame. Maybe it's not women, but it could at least be the culture. And maybe there's not even anything to do about it but play the game, but I don't see what's so wrong with saying "damn, this sucks!" every once in a while. Or saying, "I don't know what to do, I've tried things and nothing seems to work, I feel hopeless". Venting helps.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:But the fact you view "Men who are still virgins past a certain age" as some sort of outbreak is absolutely hysterical.
Nothing says "classy" as much as laughing at people's despair, amirite?
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Maybe when you stop viewing women as solely tools to get your **** wet
Right, because yuppies, guidos, bros, gangstas, rednecks, burnouts, and all the other "alpha" types are so known for how much they are so fascinated by women's personalities, and see the personality first, and the body second. Almost as much as they are known for their own kind, warm, inclusive, pleasant personalities, good values, and brilliant life choices. The fact that they mostly go after hot women is pure coincidence. And they'd never dream of objectifying women, ever!
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:you can learn that *** isn't the most important thing ever.
Well, somebody needs to tell those guys that, because they clearly didn't get the memo. They're missing out!
Not that I expect much understanding or anything, but to give you a sense of what it feels like, for me, this feels like a weight on me, or a ceiling I can't get through, or a gravity well I can't escape. Or maybe most like a gated community that I can see into, but can't get into no matter what, because I'm just not good enough. There's never been any indication that I've ever even been close to good enough for anyone, and the fear that I'm never going to get to experience not only *** but a relationship, sharing good feelings and conversation with someone on that level, all the little things, the connection, having someone like this in my lifetime is not a ******* joke, it's real. The feeling that nothing I could possibly think or say or do will ever be good enough no matter how hard I work is real, because I just can't find it in me to be "cool" and "badass" and I dont know if I can make up for it. The feeling that it's just my **** luck and I can't overcome it and change my story is real. And the feeling that I'm somehow chosen to miss out, pisses me off, especially when all kinds of unremarkable to awful guys have such an easy time with this. But there's nothing I can do except try to figure out how to be somebody else.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:all you really care about is free ***
And if you think "alpha males" care about something more than this, boy are there a lot of guys you should meet.
For someone who says that there are many different kinds of women, you sure don't believe there can be many kinds of men who struggle with attraction, or their desires and motivations. Weird.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:and any woman worth her weight picks up on that right away and rightfully wants no part of you.
A lot of people seem to get off on feeling superior to someone, and like I said, society is getting more stratified, it seems to be getting worse. If you can't be better than anyone, then who are you better than? A lot of people are very hierarchical. It sucks.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:"Stacy" and "Chad"; literally those are the only two words you say all day, I'd wager.
You mean like "self-improvement" and "entitled" for your side?
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Richard_39 said:You know, as much as I don't agree with that mindset or the whole incel movement, man makes a sad point. It IS at a historic high. At some point, people with knowledge on human psychology should really, in depth, study the phenomena and figure out exactly what is wrong.
Can we really just casually toss it on social media? Or is there really a much deeper culture problem beneath it? I wonder.
I'd chalk it up that people are maturing at a much slower rate these days for a multitude of reasons (easier lives, less responsibilities, longer lifespans, etc), and *** just happens to be one of the side-effects in that process.
I actually agree with this and think it has a lot to do with it, and I wish you'd focused on this instead cause this is actually something that could be constructive. Life, especially in middle-class suburbia, is relatively easy and low-risk. You don't really have to "be a man" around here, in fact you might even be encouraged not to cause it's against the rules or just nasty. It's not really stressed and you're told you have other options if being macho isn't for you, or you're just left to your own devices.
Guys in more redneck, working-class areas, or the hood, where there is more scarcity, violence, chaos and brawn is valued over brains, don't really have problems with this because the culture there is hyper-masculine. They expect to die young from violence, industrial accidents, or lifestyle diseases, or get a lengthy jail sentence sooner or later. You can't really be a nerdy guy in these places cause all that would make you is prey.
But that's the thing. All these inventions were made to make our lives easier, and the safe neighborhoods were made to increase quality of life. It's made us soft, but wasn't that the point, to not have to live hard lives anymore? Should we throw it all away so we can be "hard" men again? That seems kinda dumb. But "swagless" middle-class suburban guys don't excite, so, I don't know what to do.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:making people less socially adept
the guys who aren't socially ******** who can get girls
What does this really mean? Cause just talking to people isn't it. I can do that just fine. I think a lot of men can.
What it seems to mean, is the ability to project dominance socially through sarcasm, "negging"/the game of insults and comebacks, crudeness, boasting, and as I said earlier, ****-talking other people or things to make you seem cooler by comparison. Always maneuvering for the social high ground. But what's the alternative if this isn't "you"?
Oh and you might not want to throw that word around. Just sayin'.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:ardour said:Celibacy is up by 30% for men in their 20s, compared to 8% for women.
Who... cares?
Uh...the guys struggling with this and want some answers so they can get out of it and start experiencing a normal part of life, something that's supposed to be one of the best parts of life, like everyone else, who has been taking it for granted for years, maybe? And no, I'm not talking about just ***. I'm talking about a relationship, the whole thing.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:God, you and your like-minded pal here really put too much stake into things like ***. Sure do wonder why.... yep...
"God, you poors really put too much stake into things like jobs, money, and possessions. Sure do wonder why.... yep..."
"God, you homeless really put too much stake into things like homes. Sure do wonder why.... yep..."
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Didn't I tell you before that it was obvious to women what the only thing you really want out of them is?
Thanks for making it even more blatant.
I say again - yuppies, guidos, bros, gangstas, rednecks/burnouts, and all kinds of celebrities "only want one thing out of women" and they don't even try to hide it, nor do they hide the fact that they think they are above women and that women exist just for their sexual gratification.
But you let these guys slide. Why?
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:and at least we know they're the last of their generation and there won't be more of them, at least from their bloodlines.
Not a bad outcome, honestly.
...
Like I said, good. Women deserve better.
...
Also, we even have cures for that. It's called a hooker. So either go get laid or shut up already with this incessant whining.
Wow. You know, I actually agreed with you on some posts of yours on other threads, and liked some of the things you said. Sometimes you could even say something that sounded a little bit hopeful. But this, you pushed it too far. I get that this isn't my forum and I'm not a mod but this isn't cool.
I mean, do you not get or care about how insulting and degrading that last part is..."you are so inherently inferior and worthless that you have to risk life-ruining diseases, pay money, oh and break the law to get what guys with legitimately, unapologetically awful personalities have been taking for granted all their lives".
"You guys need to just be confident and take responsibility bro...but it doesn't really matter, because you're inherently lesser."
And it's no more constructive than simply complaining about the problem either.
Probably. He thinks he can cow them, that they won't put up a fight. Not this fish, though.TheRealCallie said:You sure seem to enjoy harassing some people, why is that? Do it make you feel superior or a sense of control? You know how that makes you look, right?
I got a little passionate here, and holy hell, I actually agreed with you multiple times in one post. Now if you'll all excuse me, there's a tall, red goat-looking fellow knocking on my door and asking if he can borrow a coat.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Didn't know you until now..... and yikes. Another live one here.
There's no reasoning with someone as deluded as you. I'll spare my precious time.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Here's my official response to everything you just wrote:
Oh ******* brother.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:There is no reasoning at all with someone so deluded.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Have fun with your miserable life. I feel nothing but pity for you.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:But... are you sure you're going to go and agree with Callie there? She is a woman after all. Can't have that.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:TheSkaFish said:michael2 said:We live in a society where women have been built up and men relentlessly torn down. It's gotten so bad women have essentially become untouchable. ... Meanwhile a guy with a 'dad bod' is mercilessly trashed.
Naturally women still desire a degree of male validation but that can easily be found on social media. This leaves men seeking female validation from women who are his physical and social equal. But he can't get it because those women get their validation online and don't need to get it from him.
It's the SkaFish Wall of Text Show. Read at your peril!
You know, I find it ironic that you mention the "dad bod" because I remember one of my favorite models saying somewhere on YouTube that she liked "dad bods". I thought to myself, "sooo, howYOU doin'...." lol. Anyway. I don't think that's the issue here, I haven't seen anyone get trashed for it. And I don't think the situation is as extreme as you or some others online have said. It's easy to exaggerate when you are in despair. I am too. But, I do think that there's definitely something going on.
I've heard about the social media thing too, and one thing I try to do is that if I'm attracted to a woman online, I try to avoid "liking" or commenting on photos of herself, and only about pictures or other posts about her interests, or if she actually says or does something I think is cool. I try to make sure I send the message that I'm not here to be an orbiter, to be used for validation, I'm here to talk about the things about them that I find interesting and hopefully connect. I don't think it's a magic answer, but I try to be more conscious of any little thing I can do to avoid them categorizing me as some kind of inferior, and instead as an equal, someone to take seriously.
michael2 said:The common criticism of incels is that these men think they are entitled to ***. Common critiques are for these men to improve themselves and stop whining. Such responses are typical misandry you see on a daily basis. When men have problems, they are simply told to shut up and pull ther boot straps up and deal with it.
Think for a second that an incel has to endure. He's constantly told by society and media what a loser he is for not having a girlfriend or ***, not to mention his natural tendencies for wanting love from the opposite ***. So a significant portion of his self worth is tied up with female validation. When women, even those equal to him in status and physical looks ignore him because they get their validation from social media, this can be devastating. It's like an eco system that has been thrown out of balance and because men, not women are getting the raw deal nobody cares.
That's another common theme I've seen, which frankly pisses me off. Nobody seems to want to hear when men are having a hard time, nobody wants to offer compassion or even a space to vent, let alone actually telling men what to do to fix things beyond the generic "self-improve", like what does that even mean. You're supposed to know this stuff instinctively, and if you don't, people just write you off as weak and inherently inferior, and your suffering is right and natural. It's funny because people seem to preach self-improvement to men as the answer, but also believing in biological determinism at the same time. I always think, what if you try self-improvement and it doesn't work? This "advice", it always seems insincere, like they tell you to self-improve while not really believing that you can, because it's more about them wanting to come off as the good guy than about actually helping you figure this out. I feel like it's pretty sick that for what is to some people a genuine cause of distress, others who have mostly never been in this situation or only got out due to dumb luck feel like it's a joke.
And the whole "entitled to ***" thing is particularly aggravating, because that's basically one of the key parts of the "alpha male" personality. Yet nobody ever seems to care about that. The funny thing is, if you try to have some confidence or try to assert yourself like they say a man is supposed to, then they turn around and use the word "entitled" to try and beat you back down into your place. It makes you feel like you're never going to be good enough. Honestly I think it's just a word that people use to invalidate and socially police people they feel are weaker than them, and that's pretty much it.
While nobody is saying anyone should be forced to date anyone they don't like, wanting to be with someone sexually, romantically, emotionally is a valid human wish, much more central to our well-being than something like being rich or a celebrity. It's not an "extra". So all this "entitled to ***" stuff, well, **** that noise.
And I totally hear you about society and the media. Society says be confident, don't base your self worth on others, and all that, then turns around and virgin-shames you. It's another one of these double standards.
michael2 said:I agree women have issues they have to deal with as well. But being an average looking guy nowadays is insufferable. If you don't have 6 pack abs or an aggressive dominating personality your considered inferior, or a beta male.
I'd say it's this, right here - not the 6 pack, but the aggressive, competitive, dominating, hierarchical personality. Traditionally masculine interests, loudness, popularity, vulgarity, sarcasm, "negging", and crude sexual slang or innuendoes, booze and drugs, money, violence, or breaking the law (or at least the illusion of these things), objectifying women (ironically), an attitude of superiority, and either the business ****** or the industrial worker/redneck/outlaw/burnout archetype. That's the thing I've seen is the most surefire way of attracting a woman. Someone can say it's not nice to say that, or it's misogynistic, or whatever. But I'm not saying this to be offensive. I'm saying it because I've witnessed it, many times.
It seems the only way around that is by being very successful, like being nearly a pro athlete or musician or actor, being a CEO or some other very well-paid position, being a member of an elite military unit, being some kind of extreme sports guy, or something like that. It would be nice if we could all just "work hard" and "believe in ourselves" and "not give up" until we could get to this level, but I'm not sure if it's possible. For me, a big thing that I ponder, maybe too much, is the idea of natural, genetic talent vs. hard work. Born vs made, nature vs nurture. Which is more important? If your genetics, your nature are all zeroes, what can you really do?
Other than that, the only other option seems to be dumb luck. Hoping and wishing. It's frustrating because it's like people feel like the only reason a guy isn't macho is because he's like you said, some kind of biologically inferior beta male, and not because he just doesn't have those interests, doesn't come from that culture, just doesn't feel the need to be that way.
michael2 said:When is the issue ever women? They are never held accountable. If a man says on his dating profile he wants a woman with large breasts, then he is a sexist who sees women as objects. If a woman writes on her dating profile she wants a man at least 6' tall with 6 pack abs she's just describing the guy she wants physically and won't be judged.Issue is you, not women.
Truth. Again, I haven't seen the 6 pack thing, but I've seen the height thing lots of times. Luckily for me height isn't my problem, but still. Another double standard.
That's the thing though. As long as you still want a woman, there's nothing any of us can really do about this. Sometime between now and our parents' day, the culture changed, values changed. I find that there's a lot of parallels between dating and capitalism. You can say the system sucks all day, but as long as it has something you want or need, you have no choice but to learn the rules and play the game.
michael2 said:Tell me how much self improvement Chad put in to be so attractive to women? He lifted some weights?
What effort are women putting into improving themselves? Or are they perfect as they are like what feminism wants us to believe? And men are toxic dirty losers who need to shape up to be to worthy of perfect women.
A lot of these guys? Not ****. Words like "self-improvement", "hard work", and "discipline" aren't in their dictionary, not that they have one. A lot of these guys can't even be assed to go to the gym, and I can tell because they have no muscle tone. They get by on just being born into a strong-fat body type, and a macho personality. It's sort of amazing how far you can go on these two things alone.
Recently I looked up some people I went to school with online, just to see what the deal is. These guys were the shady people, kind of like a cross between Jersey Shore guidos and Homer Simpson, if he was a ******. Most of them are straight-up fat, and talk about nothing except generic macho interests. They all talk and look more or less the same, and like whatever culture is popular right now. They seem to have very little ambition beyond getting a cozy job where they don't have to think much, and they don't seem to do anything except drink and yell in various places. And yet, almost all of these guys either have a girlfriend, or are even married. Granted, I wouldn't be interested in the women they're with, but still. I feel like I have to do all this work just to "have a personality" or "be interesting" or whatever, and it might be beyond my abilities or it just might not work, and these guys basically have to just show up, drunk, loud, slovenly, not really good at anything and no intellectual curiosity and not even in shape or good-looking, and it's OK. I can't help but feel like, what the **** man, seriously.
To be fair, a lot of women actually do put a lot of work into being attractive, at least physically. But where a lot of them don't seem to do much work, is personality-wise. I can't tell you how many dating profiles I've seen that list traveling, pizza, wine, country, rap, or EDM, "going out and staying in", and "loving to laugh" as their interests, if that much, and they all more or less talk and think the same way. I don't know how I'd talk to someone like this even if I wanted to. And I don't, cause I want someone I want to explore, and can share my interests and enthusiasm with and would take me in a direction I want to go. But people like that are few and far between, and also think they are better than me, I guess.
I don't know, man. All I can say is, somewhere along the line culture changed, people got colder and more into status and power, and I think we have to accept that we have to do more work to be good enough than the machos, and maybe even the average guy, and we have less margin for error. People don't WANT to give us a break, we have to overcome their prejudgment that we are lesser. As non-macho men, our fitness, intelligence, sense of style, abilities, knowledge base, finances, and all that has to be on point, and we have to make sure that when talking to a woman we want to date, we have to look like our life is some kind of party all the time, and to show as little weakness as possible. It's just the way it is.
ardour said:^Confidence is connected to stereotypical notions of masculinity, whether you want to admit that or not, so you're kind of re-enforcing his point (that self-improvement is only expected of men).
I don't really agree with the Chad/Stacey, 80/20 crap, since it's obviously a ridiculous exaggeration, but men are facing a lot of mixed messages lately. On one hand cishet males are 'toxic' with entitlement and a threat to everyone around them. Yet they're still expected to be the initiators, to carry and earn relationships and exemplify stoicism while doing it. It's no wonder socially awkward men become bitter and buy into certain ideas to try to explain it all.
Right you are. I've seen something like "women are loved for who they are, while men are loved for what they do" or something similar, a couple times. Of course, this doesn't apply to the machos, who get out of jail free.
The thing I think is, as a male, it seems like you can't just do whatever, be any way you want to be. There are tons of unspoken rules, or things that are presented as choices if they're presented at all, but are more like rules. And there's all these nuances. "Be yourself" - except when your interests and personality aren't macho. "Don't worry about fitting in or being popular or cool" - except that's what a lot of women wind up going for. "Be nice, get good grades, stay out of trouble" - except that it gets everyone to see you as a lame and sometimes fighting is the answer. "Don't be shallow and judge people for their looks and money or act like you're better than anyone else" - except that the "cool" guys do, and it doesn't hurt them at all. "Women like sweet guys" - except that they tend to go for guys who are into violence, sarcasm, vulgarity, sexual slang and innuendos, the game of insults and comebacks, and an air of superiority. "It's OK to be sensitive and non-macho, talk about your feelings" - except when it gets women to see you as naturally weak and inherently inferior, like it is right in this thread.
Bluesunshineday said:This is so scary to me...this attitude.
Can we educate and help??
What's scary to me is how social Darwinism seems to be on the rise, and there seems to be less and less compassion for people whose interests, personality, and background don't match the new culture and values. "I've got mine, screw you" and "if you can't compete, you're inferior" seems to be getting more and more common.
As for educating and helping, one thing that would help is for women to say what they actually want. I've seen it said many times that in our society, women are "pressured to be nice", due to gender roles, keeping up appearances, and a desire to avoid conflict. I say, say what you mean. If you want a nice and sweet and sensitive guy, say so. If you want a sarcastic, insulting guy, or a lewd and crude overly sexual guy, or a guy who looks like he's spent his whole life in and out of jail, or a guy who shows up in a Ferrari, say so. Own it, no matter how nice or nasty, and decide what is really "you". Don't say what you think your parents or friends or society wants to hear.
Same with guys. They should be told something like "go ahead and be 'nerdy' if you want, but realize that it's probably going to make finding a girlfriend harder" instead of "be yourself" or "do whatever you want". Or "sometimes you have to curse someone out or fight, even though you will probably get in trouble for this" instead of "be nice".
The more people know, the more they can make informed choices instead of just doing whatever and wondering why it doesn't work. I think a little honesty on all sides would go a long way.
TheRealCallie said:I don't base who I am attracted to on looks alone. Personality is far more important to me, as is who the guy is on the inside.
That's actually pretty admirable. Not being sarcastic either. But you have to understand that it's also not that common.
TheRealCallie said:Perhaps part of your problem is that you seem all about negativity, whereas "Chad" has confidence and knows how to put a good foot forward.
It's easy for "Chad" to have confidence because things have been going his way literally from birth, so why wouldn't he be confident when he knows no other way? At some point in his early youth, he realizes he is bigger and stronger and/or richer than others, and believes it must be that he is inherently better than them. Or, he's from a "hard" culture, and only presented one choice for his personality. He makes friends with like-minded guys, and life pretty much lets them coast for the rest of their days. Nothing ever threatens to kick their *** or show them up or force them to shut up, drop the ego, and get in line.
Meanwhile as a non-macho man, things rarely ever go your way, and probably nobody even tells you why cause they don't know themselves. It starts to feel pretty hopeless when you try different things, but no matter what you do, it just doesn't budge. It looks so easy for everyone else but you, you're frozen out. I can't remember if I was ever told this specifically, but I've heard "just be confident" before. But the problem with that is, it's incomplete advice. Confidence comes from past wins, things you are good at, things you can beat others at, times where you made things go your way with your power, cunning, or skill. If you don't have any past wins or special skills, things you seem to just naturally take to, then you're going to have a hard time justifying a confident attitude.
TheRealCallie said:But a lot of people confuse confidence with arrogance. "Chad" has both, confidence gets him in the door, but that confidence is soon revealed to be arrogance. A lot of people can't tell the difference at first meetings unless it's very obvious.
I have yet to hear of a woman break up with a man because of arrogance, let alone refusing to give him a chance in the first place because of arrogance. Maybe it happens, but I don't think it's common.
TheRealCallie said:So yeah "Chad" might get more dates, but how successful is he at maintaining those relationships?
From what I've seen? Very. It seems like a simple formula, even: remember to smooth-talk and pepper your conversations with insults and comebacks or sexual innuendoes, or just insult other people or things to make yourself seem cooler/tougher/"edgier" by comparison. Then all you have to do is don't beat, don't cheat, rinse wash repeat. At least that's how it looks to me.
TheRealCallie said:That said, Chad is likely an *******
Well, thanks for admitting that much. It's better than nothing, I'll take it!
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:The issue is you, not women. Convincing yourself of this conspiracy and being around others who propagate that notion has and will continue to do nothing for you.
Couldn't it possibly be that at least a part of this is that culture changed, and what used to be good advice for attracting women is now out of date? Or that some people's interests, personality, body, and culture aren't favored in this area of life?
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:These guys make it their defining trait
It's kind of forced on them. Hence, "involuntary".
Besides, what other traits could they have instead? Personally, I fear that guys wind up this way because they're both untalented (and therefore unable to really cultivate other traits effectively), and not macho, which is how most machos get around not having to bother with talent or knowledge or cultivating a unique personality.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:don't want to do the work (IE, self-improvement, introspection, not blaming others) that would actually fix their issues.
See, this is what I'm talking about. You say self-improvement is the answer one minute, then you say no, they're all ****** because of biological determinism the next. Which is it? Would self-improvement fix their issues, or are they too untalented or genetically inferior to self-improve in any meaningful way?
I've personally read countless articles and typed pages of introspection to myself, going over my entire life and trying to figure out how I got here. I feel like I've finally figured out a lot, but I wish I'd known all this stuff sooner.
And I've tried to self-improve in various ways. But nothing happened, not with women, not even with the things I was trying to improve at. And I'm not the only one. I've never been a member of any incel forums, and I don't plan to either, but I read some stuff there just to see what kinds of people are on there anyway and what their situation is really like instead of letting the media tell me what to think and seeing if their situation was like mine, and if you don't count the trolls and extremely stereotypical nerds, some of them are actually fairly regular people. That's the scary part. A lot of these guys, they lift weights, they stay in shape, they're educated and have at least half-decent to good jobs, they read and have interests and hobbies, they have their own place, and some of them even have nice cars. They do everything a man is supposed to and all the "self-improvement" ****, but no women care. Some of them seem like well-spoken people with a decent enough disposition, but the main thing seems to be they all lack that aggressive, competitive, dominant, hierarchical personality. They don't have that "edgy", sarcastic, mocking, sneering tone. None of them seem very casually superior or rebellious either. I think women think of them as "boringly friendly" middle-class guys. They come across as too mild, no thrills, no suspense. They don't have power to lord over anyone. They come across as too G-rated, too Disney, not offensive or dangerous - at least not in the "cool" sense of those terms, the kind that comes from a place of power instead of frustration. And I'm not sure what anyone can do about that.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:They ***** and moan loudly
Remind us about this next time something is getting you down.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Even trying to help them and say there are many types of women, and maybe they're after the wrong types, etc, and even when I say I've lived these experiences too; you only get replies of "Where do these women exist? I want to go there!" or the like.
That still doesn't really help though. I've seen difference in personalities and interests, but not so much the guys they choose. What makes someone "wrong" or "right" anyway? It's more than common interests or being able to hold a conversation, that's for sure. And what if I don't like anyone that is "right" for me, because the only thing that makes them "right" is common problems, the main thing I have in common with the person is something that I wish I didn't have?
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Even though what I'm describing is 99% of women and they're everywhere. The women who posted in THIS topic are further proof that almost no woman acts like the "Stacy" they've built up in their minds.
I wouldn't say that people on a forum for loneliness - and I include myself here - are an accurate representation of the mainstream population. No offense, but we're here mostly because of problems, not because everything goes our way. How people feel and think about things on here isn't necessarily what most people feel and think, cause they don't have our personalities and haven't had our experiences. I don't like using these terms, but you're not going to hear from "Stacies" in a place like this, cause they just aren't going to be here.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:But see, it's always outside forces; someone else's fault. It wouldn't matter if they changed location or any other superficial thing they think will help; THEY, with their inane and idiotic mindset are the real turn off, so they'll see it wherever they are, wherever they go, because it's them that is the problem.
Again, what can they do? Try and get good at things they may not be able to, or even be interested in? Adopt personalities way outside of their culture and everything they agree with or makes sense for them to be?
Personal responsibility can help with some things, but sometimes it doesnt do anything, and sometimes there really is someone to blame. Maybe it's not women, but it could at least be the culture. And maybe there's not even anything to do about it but play the game, but I don't see what's so wrong with saying "damn, this sucks!" every once in a while. Or saying, "I don't know what to do, I've tried things and nothing seems to work, I feel hopeless". Venting helps.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:But the fact you view "Men who are still virgins past a certain age" as some sort of outbreak is absolutely hysterical.
Nothing says "classy" as much as laughing at people's despair, amirite?
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Maybe when you stop viewing women as solely tools to get your **** wet
Right, because yuppies, guidos, bros, gangstas, rednecks, burnouts, and all the other "alpha" types are so known for how much they are so fascinated by women's personalities, and see the personality first, and the body second. Almost as much as they are known for their own kind, warm, inclusive, pleasant personalities, good values, and brilliant life choices. The fact that they mostly go after hot women is pure coincidence. And they'd never dream of objectifying women, ever!
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:you can learn that *** isn't the most important thing ever.
Well, somebody needs to tell those guys that, because they clearly didn't get the memo. They're missing out!
Not that I expect much understanding or anything, but to give you a sense of what it feels like, for me, this feels like a weight on me, or a ceiling I can't get through, or a gravity well I can't escape. Or maybe most like a gated community that I can see into, but can't get into no matter what, because I'm just not good enough. There's never been any indication that I've ever even been close to good enough for anyone, and the fear that I'm never going to get to experience not only *** but a relationship, sharing good feelings and conversation with someone on that level, all the little things, the connection, having someone like this in my lifetime is not a ******* joke, it's real. The feeling that nothing I could possibly think or say or do will ever be good enough no matter how hard I work is real, because I just can't find it in me to be "cool" and "badass" and I dont know if I can make up for it. The feeling that it's just my **** luck and I can't overcome it and change my story is real. And the feeling that I'm somehow chosen to miss out, pisses me off, especially when all kinds of unremarkable to awful guys have such an easy time with this. But there's nothing I can do except try to figure out how to be somebody else.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:all you really care about is free ***
And if you think "alpha males" care about something more than this, boy are there a lot of guys you should meet.
For someone who says that there are many different kinds of women, you sure don't believe there can be many kinds of men who struggle with attraction, or their desires and motivations. Weird.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:and any woman worth her weight picks up on that right away and rightfully wants no part of you.
A lot of people seem to get off on feeling superior to someone, and like I said, society is getting more stratified, it seems to be getting worse. If you can't be better than anyone, then who are you better than? A lot of people are very hierarchical. It sucks.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:"Stacy" and "Chad"; literally those are the only two words you say all day, I'd wager.
You mean like "self-improvement" and "entitled" for your side?
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Richard_39 said:You know, as much as I don't agree with that mindset or the whole incel movement, man makes a sad point. It IS at a historic high. At some point, people with knowledge on human psychology should really, in depth, study the phenomena and figure out exactly what is wrong.
Can we really just casually toss it on social media? Or is there really a much deeper culture problem beneath it? I wonder.
I'd chalk it up that people are maturing at a much slower rate these days for a multitude of reasons (easier lives, less responsibilities, longer lifespans, etc), and *** just happens to be one of the side-effects in that process.
I actually agree with this and think it has a lot to do with it, and I wish you'd focused on this instead cause this is actually something that could be constructive. Life, especially in middle-class suburbia, is relatively easy and low-risk. You don't really have to "be a man" around here, in fact you might even be encouraged not to cause it's against the rules or just nasty. It's not really stressed and you're told you have other options if being macho isn't for you, or you're just left to your own devices.
Guys in more redneck, working-class areas, or the hood, where there is more scarcity, violence, chaos and brawn is valued over brains, don't really have problems with this because the culture there is hyper-masculine. They expect to die young from violence, industrial accidents, or lifestyle diseases, or get a lengthy jail sentence sooner or later. You can't really be a nerdy guy in these places cause all that would make you is prey.
But that's the thing. All these inventions were made to make our lives easier, and the safe neighborhoods were made to increase quality of life. It's made us soft, but wasn't that the point, to not have to live hard lives anymore? Should we throw it all away so we can be "hard" men again? That seems kinda dumb. But "swagless" middle-class suburban guys don't excite, so, I don't know what to do.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:making people less socially adept
the guys who aren't socially ******** who can get girls
What does this really mean? Cause just talking to people isn't it. I can do that just fine. I think a lot of men can.
What it seems to mean, is the ability to project dominance socially through sarcasm, "negging"/the game of insults and comebacks, crudeness, boasting, and as I said earlier, ****-talking other people or things to make you seem cooler by comparison. Always maneuvering for the social high ground. But what's the alternative if this isn't "you"?
Oh and you might not want to throw that word around. Just sayin'.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:ardour said:Celibacy is up by 30% for men in their 20s, compared to 8% for women.
Who... cares?
Uh...the guys struggling with this and want some answers so they can get out of it and start experiencing a normal part of life, something that's supposed to be one of the best parts of life, like everyone else, who has been taking it for granted for years, maybe? And no, I'm not talking about just ***. I'm talking about a relationship, the whole thing.
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:God, you and your like-minded pal here really put too much stake into things like ***. Sure do wonder why.... yep...
"God, you poors really put too much stake into things like jobs, money, and possessions. Sure do wonder why.... yep..."
"God, you homeless really put too much stake into things like homes. Sure do wonder why.... yep..."
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:Didn't I tell you before that it was obvious to women what the only thing you really want out of them is?
Thanks for making it even more blatant.
I say again - yuppies, guidos, bros, gangstas, rednecks/burnouts, and all kinds of celebrities "only want one thing out of women" and they don't even try to hide it, nor do they hide the fact that they think they are above women and that women exist just for their sexual gratification.
But you let these guys slide. Why?
Enpatsu No Shakugan said:and at least we know they're the last of their generation and there won't be more of them, at least from their bloodlines.
Not a bad outcome, honestly.
...
Like I said, good. Women deserve better.
...
Also, we even have cures for that. It's called a hooker. So either go get laid or shut up already with this incessant whining.
Wow. You know, I actually agreed with you on some posts of yours on other threads, and liked some of the things you said. Sometimes you could even say something that sounded a little bit hopeful. But this, you pushed it too far. I get that this isn't my forum and I'm not a mod but this isn't cool.
I mean, do you not get or care about how insulting and degrading that last part is..."you are so inherently inferior and worthless that you have to risk life-ruining diseases, pay money, oh and break the law to get what guys with legitimately, unapologetically awful personalities have been taking for granted all their lives".
"You guys need to just be confident and take responsibility bro...but it doesn't really matter, because you're inherently lesser."
And it's no more constructive than simply complaining about the problem either.
Probably. He thinks he can cow them, that they won't put up a fight. Not this fish, though.TheRealCallie said:You sure seem to enjoy harassing some people, why is that? Do it make you feel superior or a sense of control? You know how that makes you look, right?
I got a little passionate here, and holy hell, I actually agreed with you multiple times in one post. Now if you'll all excuse me, there's a tall, red goat-looking fellow knocking on my door and asking if he can borrow a coat.
Here's my official response to everything you just wrote:
Oh ******* brother.
I didn't know you until now, and yikes. There is no reasoning at all with someone so deluded. Have fun with your miserable life. I feel nothing but pity for you.
So done with incels.
But... are you sure you're going to go and agree with Callie there? She is a woman after all. Can't have that.
Enter your email address to join: